MR. FELIX NWOYE ADIM V NIGERIAN BOTTLING COMPANY LTD Archives - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

MR. FELIX NWOYE ADIM V NIGERIAN BOTTLING COMPANY LTD

Legalpedia Citation: (2010) Legalpedia (SC) 00421

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Apr 30, 2010

Suit Number: SC.56/2003

CORAM


CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL CHUKWUMA-ENEH , JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL CHUKWUMA-ENEH , JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


MR. FELIX NWOYE ADIM APELLANT(S) / CROSS RESPONDENT(S)


NIGERIAN BOTTLING COMPANY LTD

RESPONDENTS / CROSS APPELLANTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant sued the respondent for damages from the negligent driving of the latter. He felt dissatisfied with the damages awarded so he appealed to the court of appeal; the court of appeal further reduced the damages awarded by the court of appeal. The appellant has further appealed


HELD


Appeal dismissed


ISSUES


NONE.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


DAMAGES:WHEN APPELLATE COURT CAN INTEFERE WITH AWARD-


“An appellate Court may only interfere with an award of damages when the award is manifestly too high or too low or is based on the wrong principles of law”. Per MUSDAPHER J.S.C


COSTS:TYPES-


“There is a distinction between costs awarded according to settled principles, and costs awarded in the exercise of a discretion on particular facts”. Per MUSDAPHER J.S.C


DAMAGES : HOW DETERMINED.


“The particularity of the pleading and the evidence must be such that the losses are exactly known and accurately measured”. Per MUSDAPHER J.S.C


CASES CITED


1. INCAR VS. BENSON (1975) 3 sc 117
2. BRITISH TRANSPORT COMMISSION VS. GOURLEY (1956) A,C. Pg. 185
3. ODULAJA VS. HADDAD (1973) 11 SC 351.
4. ODUMOSU VS. A.C.B. (1976) 11 SC 55.
5. AFRICAN NEWSPAPERS LTD VS. CIROMA (1996) 1 NWLR (Pt. 423) 156.
6. ROCKONOH PROP CO. LTD. VS. NITEL (2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 733 468
7. B.E.O.O. VS. MADUAKOH (1975) 12 SC 91
8. AGBAJE VS. JAMES (1967) NMLR 49, AGUNWA VS. ONUKWE (1962) 1 ALL NLR 537


STATUTES REFERRED TO


NONE


CLICK HERE TO VIEW THIS JUDGMENT