CHIEF EMMANUEL EZE ONUWKA V. ENGR SAMUEL ONONUJU Archives - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

CHIEF EMMANUEL EZE ONUWKA V. ENGR SAMUEL ONONUJU

Legalpedia Citation: (2009) Legalpedia (SC) 81688

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri May 8, 2009

Suit Number: SC. 246/2002

CORAM


ALOYSIUS IYORGYER KATSINA-ALU JUSTICE, SUPREME COURTGEORGE ADESOLA OGUNTADE JUSTICE, SUPREME COURTWA

BODE RHODES- VIVOUR, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ALOYSIUS KATSINA-ALU, JUSTICE. SUPREME COURT

ALOMA M. MUKHTAR, JUSTICE. SUPREME COURT

WALTER S. N. ONNOGHEN , JUSTICE. SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


CHIEF EMMANUEL EZE ONUWKA APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

the plaintiff/applicant sought a declaration that the defendants were not owners of the disputed land. Later on the plaintiff filed an application for discontinuance during the court’s vacation. The trial judge granted the application. The Court of Appeal set aside the decision of the trial court


HELD


APPEAL DISMISSED


ISSUES


“1. Whether the court below was right in setting aside the orders of   the   trial  court made on 26/ 8/9the ground that the order was void having been made during vacation in a matter that does not  warrant urgent attention within the meaning of Order 26 Rule  9(2)(b) and (c) of the  Anambra State High  Court Rules?

2. Whether the court below was right in setting aside the trial court’s Order dated the 21st day January, 2000, on the ground that the order was not made judicially and judiciously?

3. Whether the court below was right in setting aside the trial court’s Orders of 26/8/98 and21/1/2000, when the Orders did not occasion a miscarriage of justice and no injustice was suffered  by the Respondents?”

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


WHEN A PROCESS BECOMES NULLIFIED


Any process taken contrary to the provisions of the law Is a nullity for which the affected party Is at liberty to set aside ex debito justitiae. Per CHUKWUMA.ENEH,JSC


CIVIL MATTERS NOT TO BE ENTERTAINED DURING VACATION


By the Rules, during the Annual Vacation of the court, no civil matter or Application shall be entertained by the judex unless, on the face of it, it is seen to be urgent or both parties to the case agree that the case or Application be entertained. Where the other party refuses to grant his consent, the court has no Jurisdiction to entertain the suit or the Application. Per ADEREMI, JSC


CASES CITED


Rasaki  v. Egeiben (1994) 6 NWLR (Pt.348) 23


STATUTES REFERRED TO


High Court 0f Anambra State (Civil Procedure) Rules, 1988


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT