ANAMELECHI ITEOGU VS THE LEGAL PRACTITIONERS DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE Archives - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

ANAMELECHI ITEOGU VS THE LEGAL PRACTITIONERS DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE

Legalpedia Citation: (2009-12) Legalpedia 85576 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden at Abuja

Fri Dec 4, 2009

Suit Number: SC 190/2006

CORAM


A.I. KATSINA-ALU, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

M. MOHAMMED, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

W.S.N. ONNOGHEN, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

C.M. CHUKWUMA-ENEH, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

M. S. MUNTAKA-COMMASSIE, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


ANAMELECHI ITEOGU ESQ

APPELLANTS 


THE LEGAL PRACTITIONERS DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


LEGAL PRACTITIONER – LOCUS STANDI

 

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

Complaints of misconduct in a professional respect was brought against the appellant for whom the respondent found him guilty and directed that his name be struck off the Roll of Legal Practitioners and that he pays the sum of 9.5million to the petitioner.

 

 


HELD


Appeal dismissed

 

 


ISSUES


NONE

 

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


A LEGAL PRACTITIONER WILL BE PUNISHED ONLY FOR MISCONDUCT IN PROFESSIONAL RESPECT


A legal practitioner cannot be punished under the Act, for all misconducts but only misconducts in a professional capacity or respects. Per CHUKWUMA-ENEH, JSC

 

 


WHEN THE COURTS WILL INTERVENE IN A DISPUTE


The courts of law do not intervene unless one of the parties to the dispute having the necessary locus standi to do so, invokes their judicial powers. The term locus standi means standing to sue. Per CHUKWUMA-ENEH, JSC

 

 




CASES CITED


1. GOURIET V. UNION OF POST OFFICE WORKERS & ANOR.. (1977) 2 WLR 310; (1978) A/C 435 at 496

2. SENATOR ABRAHAM ADESANY A V. PRESIDENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA & ANOR. (1961) 5 SC .112 at 184

 

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


1. Legal Practitioners Act, Cap. 207, Laws of the federation of Nigeria, 1990

 

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT