SAIDU H. AHMED & 2 ORS V CENTRAL BANK OF NIGERIA Archives - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

SAIDU H. AHMED & 2 ORS V CENTRAL BANK OF NIGERIA

Legalpedia Citation: (2012) Legalpedia (SC) 11591

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Jul 6, 2012

Suit Number: SC. 34/2005

CORAM


ELIAS,CHIEF JUSTICE, NIGERIA


PARTIES


1. SAIDU H.AHMED

2. LEADING LEATHER PRODUCTS LTD.

3. SAIDTALL SHOES LTD.

APPELLANTS 


CENTRAL BANK OF NIGERIA

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The respondents sued and got judgment against the appellant at the trial court. The appellant sought an injunction at the court of appeal to stay execution pending appeal and leave to for extension of time within which to appeal; the Court of appeal refused all.  The appellant has further appealed to the Supreme Court.


HELD


The appeal was allowed


ISSUES


(1) Whether the applicant has set forth good and substantial reasons for failing to seek leave to appeal within the prescribed period.?

(2)  Whether leave to appeal ought to be granted in favour of the Applicant.?

(3) Whether the applicant is entitled to an order of injunction restraining the respondents from executing the judgment sought to be stayed by this appeal.?

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


STAY OF EXECUTION PENDING APPEAL


“The first is the long settled principle that the victorious party should not be denied of the fruits of his victory. And the other principle being that where it is evident that the party who has lost in the lower court is challenging upon very good ground, the order made in favour of the victorious party before an Appellate Court, then an order for the stay of the execution of that judgment may be made”. (Per Ejiwunmi JSC).


STAY OF EXECUTION PENDING APPEAL


“It must be remembered that before an application of this kind could succeed, the applicant must satisfy the Court that there are good and satisfactory reasons for not filing his application timeously. It must also be shown that the applicant has good substantial and arguable grounds of appeal”. (Per Ejiwunmi JSC).


CASES CITED


1. Ibodo & Ors. v. Enarofia & Ors. (1980) N.S.C.C. 195;

2. University of Lagos v. Olaniyan (1985) 1 N.W.L R. (Pt.1) 156.

3. Obikoya v. Wema Bank Ltd. (1989) 1 NWLR (Pt. 96) 157.,(1989) 1 SC. (Pt.1) 132.

4. Wilson v. Church No.2 (1879) 12 Ch. D. 454

5. Vaswani Trading Company v. Savalakh & Company (1972) N.S.C.C. 692

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


None


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT