FASAKIN FOODS NIG. LTD VS MARTINS BABATUNDE SHOSANYA - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

FASAKIN FOODS NIG. LTD VS MARTINS BABATUNDE SHOSANYA

EMESPO J. CONTINENTAL LTD. V CORONA SHIFAH-RTSGESELLSCHAFT & ORS LER (2006) SC 252/2000
June 6, 2025
NEWSWATCH COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED V. ALHAJI ALIYU IBRAHIM ATTA
June 6, 2025
EMESPO J. CONTINENTAL LTD. V CORONA SHIFAH-RTSGESELLSCHAFT & ORS LER (2006) SC 252/2000
June 6, 2025
NEWSWATCH COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED V. ALHAJI ALIYU IBRAHIM ATTA
June 6, 2025
Show all

FASAKIN FOODS NIG. LTD VS MARTINS BABATUNDE SHOSANYA

Legalpedia Citation: (2006-04) Legalpedia 10449 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Abuja

Fri Apr 28, 2006

Suit Number: SC.312/2001

CORAM


S. M. A. BELGORE JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

U. A. KALGO JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

N. TOBI JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

M. MOHAMMED JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

W. S. ONNOGHEN JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

I.F. OGBUAGU JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


FASAKIN FOODS NIG. LTD

APPELLANTS 


MARTINS BABATUNDE SHOSANYA

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


NATIONAL ASSEMBLY – JURISDICTION OF COURT – INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES – FEDERAL HIGH COURT ACT

 

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant sued the respondent at the Lagos High Court over some matters that border on the operations of Companies. The High court upheld the preliminary objection of respondent and transferred the matter to the Federal High Court.

 

 


HELD


It was held that State High Court has no power to transfer a suit to the Federal High Court.

 

 


ISSUES


Whether or not, the trial Court, had the jurisdiction to transfer the said suit to the Federal High Court for hearing and determination

 

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES


‘It is now firmly established, that in the principle of construction or interpretation of a Statute or Constitution, the ordinary meaning of words, apply prima facie’.OGBUAGU JSC

 

 


POWER TO MAKE PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE OF THE COURTS


 

‘It could be seen from the above provisions of the said two Sections, that while only the National Assembly, could make laws, with respect to the practice and procedure in the Federal High Court, the power to make similar laws for the High Court of a State, is vested in the House of Assembly of a State’ OGBUAGU JSC

 

 


LACK OF JURISDICTION – EFFECT OF


‘Where a Court holds that it has no jurisdiction, the proper order to make, is to strike out the suit or proceedings. It does not transfer and cannot transfer’ OGBUAGU JSC

 

 


CASES CITED


1. Omoijahe u Umoru & Ors. (1999) 5 SCNJ280 ,

2. Ibrahim v Ojomo & 3 Ors. (2004) 4 NWLR (Pt. 862) 89; (2004) 1 SCNJ 309, (2004) 1 S. C. (All)136 & 147,

3. City Engineering (Nig.) Ltd. v Nigerian Airport Authority (1999) 9 SCNJ 263; (1999) 6 S. C (Pt. II) 41 at 47,

 

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


1. Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1979

2. Federal High Court Act

 

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.