EMESPO J. CONTINENTAL LTD. V CORONA SHIFAH-RTSGESELLSCHAFT & ORS LER (2006) SC 252/2000 - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

EMESPO J. CONTINENTAL LTD. V CORONA SHIFAH-RTSGESELLSCHAFT & ORS LER (2006) SC 252/2000

ALHAJI IBRAHIM ABDULHAMID V. TALAL AKAR & ANOR
June 6, 2025
FASAKIN FOODS NIG. LTD VS MARTINS BABATUNDE SHOSANYA
June 6, 2025
ALHAJI IBRAHIM ABDULHAMID V. TALAL AKAR & ANOR
June 6, 2025
FASAKIN FOODS NIG. LTD VS MARTINS BABATUNDE SHOSANYA
June 6, 2025
Show all

EMESPO J. CONTINENTAL LTD. V CORONA SHIFAH-RTSGESELLSCHAFT & ORS LER (2006) SC 252/2000

Legalpedia Citation: (2006) Legalpedia (SC) 79111

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri May 5, 2006

Suit Number: SC. 252/2000

CORAM


LEWIS CHIEF JUSTICE, NIGERIA


PARTIES


EMESPO J. CONTINENTAL LTD APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The plaintiff sued the defendants for shortage in the delivery of its goods shipped from France. He has sued CMB S. A. (The owners of M. V. Concordia) while CMB S.A is not the owner of the vessel. He sought to join the respondent (the real owner) as a 3rd defendant after the limitation period.     ?


HELD


It was held that this is not a case of misnomer as the plaintiff has sued a non-existing person.


ISSUES


1. Whether on the facts of the case, the Court of Appeal was correct in holding that the Plaintiff/Appellant had not established a case of a misnomer. 2. Whether the conclusions reached by the Court of Appeal on the issues for determination formulated by the parties before it and the manner in which that Court considered the appeal did not prejudice the case of the Respondent (now Appellant) resulting in a miscarriage of justice


RATIONES DECIDENDI


ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION


“Authorities abound on the essence of issues raised for determination in parties briefs of argument. Issues are meant to flow from the grounds of appeal in an appeal, and where they do not so flow, they become incompetent and will be struck out by the court.”… MUHKTAR JSC


TEST FOR DETERMINING A MISNOMER


“A crucial factor in determining whether what happened was misnomer or not is whether there is an existing entity which has been given wrong name such wrong name not being the name of another entity”. MUHKTAR JSC.


CASES CITED


1. Dennis Njemanze v. Shell B.P. Port Harcourt 1966 1 All N.L.R., 2. Nteogwuile v. Otuo (2001) 16 NWLR Part 238 page 58, 3. Olowosogo v. Adebanjo 1988 4 NWLR Part 88 page 275. 4. Alhaji Kokoro-Owo and 6 Ors. v. Lagos State Government and 4 Ors (2001) 11 NWLR part 723 page 237, 5. U.A.C. Nigeria Ltd v. Global Transport S.A. 19965 NWLR part 448 page 291, 6. Nnaji v. Ede 1996 8 NWLR part 466 page 332.


STATUTES REFERRED TO


NONE


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.