CLEMENT OBRI VS THE STATE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

CLEMENT OBRI VS THE STATE

MUSA V YERMIA
July 3, 2025
ABUBAKAR UMARU ABBA TUKUR VS THE GOVERNMENT OF TARABA STATE & ORS
July 3, 2025
MUSA V YERMIA
July 3, 2025
ABUBAKAR UMARU ABBA TUKUR VS THE GOVERNMENT OF TARABA STATE & ORS
July 3, 2025
Show all

CLEMENT OBRI VS THE STATE

Legalpedia Citation: (1997) Legalpedia (SC) 31190

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

HOLDEN AT ABUJA

Thu Jul 3, 1997

Suit Number: SC.103/1996

CORAM


A.B. WALI

SUNDAY AKINOLA AKINTAN JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

Ita George Mbaba JCA

M.L. UWAIS, CHIEF JUSTICE, NIGERIA

U. MOHAMMED


PARTIES


CLEMENT OBRI APPELLANTS


THE STATE RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

SUMMARY OF FACTS
The accused was convicted of murder by the evidence of a small child who was the only eye witness.


HELD


The appeal therefore succeeds and it is hereby allowed. The judgements of both the High Court and the Court of Appeal are accordingly set aside. The appellant is found not guilty of the offence charged and is hereby discharged and acquitted.


ISSUES


The issue here is – who killed the deceased? Whether or not he (PW1 )saw the murderer commit murder in this case. Whether the Court of Appeal was right when it came to the conclusion that the learned trial judge had complied with the provisions of Sect ion I55(1) and 183(1) of the Evidence Act. Cap 112 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria before receiving the evidence of PW.1, a small child aged about 7 years.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


SWORN AND UNSWORN EVIDENCE


Where a witness’s real testimony in court contradicts or is inconsistent with his previous extra judicial statement, the court should not only regard the sworn oral testimony as being unreliable but also the previous statement whether sworn or unsworn as not constituting evidence upon which it can act.


UNSWORN EVIDENCE OF A CHILD MUST BE CORROBORATED


The court must not convict on the unsworn evidence of a child such as the P.W.1 unless his evidence is corroborated by some other material evidence in support thereof implicating the accused


CASES CITED


R. v. Ukpong (1961) All NLR 25,Asanya v. The State (1991) 3 NWLR (Pt.180) 422, Oladejo v. The State (1987)3 NWLR (part 61) 419,Umani v. The State (1988) I NWLR (Pt 70)274,Esangbedo v. The State (1989) 4 NWLR (Pt. 113)57


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Evidence Act. Cap 112 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria|


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.