ABUBAKAR UMARU ABBA TUKUR VS THE GOVERNMENT OF TARABA STATE & ORS - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

ABUBAKAR UMARU ABBA TUKUR VS THE GOVERNMENT OF TARABA STATE & ORS

CLEMENT OBRI VS THE STATE
July 3, 2025
DOPEMU TAIWO ADEYERI & ORS VS AKINBODE OKOBI & ORS
July 3, 2025
CLEMENT OBRI VS THE STATE
July 3, 2025
DOPEMU TAIWO ADEYERI & ORS VS AKINBODE OKOBI & ORS
July 3, 2025
Show all

ABUBAKAR UMARU ABBA TUKUR VS THE GOVERNMENT OF TARABA STATE & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1997) Legalpedia (SC) 11312

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Jun 27, 1997

Suit Number: SC. 143/1996

CORAM


CORAMSALIHU MODIBBO ALFA BELGORE JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT (Presided)IDRIS LEGBO KUTIGI JUSTICE, SUPREM

SOWEMOMI, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

YEKINI OLAYIWOLA ADIO JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ANTHONY IKECHUKWU IGUH JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


ABUBAKAR UMARU ABBA TUKUR APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant/plaintiff sued the respondent/defendants for wrongful deposition as the Emir, for breach of his fundamental rights amongst other claims. The Trial Court gave judgment for the appellant. The respondent then appealed being dissatisfied. The Court of Appeal unanimously allowed the appeal. Being dissatisfied, the appellant has appealed to this Court.  ?


HELD


The net result of all I have been saying is that this appeal fails and it is hereby dismissed by me. I award N1,000.00 costs of this appeal to the 1st respondent only.


ISSUES


Whether the Court of Appeal was right in entertaining and determining the 1st respondent’s third ground of appeal in Appeal No. CA/J/206/93?Was the Court of Appeal correct when it held that the trial court lacked the jurisdiction to entertain the appellant’s claims?Whether the Court of Appeal was right in reducing the N6,000,000.00 awarded in favour of the appellant by the trial court to N1,000,000.00?  ?


RATIONES DECIDENDI


BRIEF WRITING


The appellate courts have not relented in frowning against breaches of the rules of brief writing. But no appeal has been refused on the sole ground of a defective brief. Per OGUNDARE JSC


CASES CITED


Ikeanyi v. A.C.B. et al (1997) 2 NWLR (Pt.489) 509.In Omojasola v. Plison Fisko (Nig.) Ltd (1990) 5 NWLR (Pt. 151) 434 at 441 F-HObiora v. Osele (1989) 1 NWLR (Pt.97) 279 at 300 F-GAkpan v. The State (1992) 6 NWLR (Pt.248) 439 at 458 A-ELabiyi v. Anretiola (1992) 10 SCNJ 1 at 11; (1992) 1 NWLR (Pt.97) 279Bankole v. Pelu (1991) 11 SCNJ 108 at 120; (1992) 8 NWLR (Pt.211) 353


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Fundamental Rights (Enforcement Procedure) Rules, 1979The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1979


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.