WALTER WIRI & ORS V GODWIN WUCHE & ORS - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

WALTER WIRI & ORS V GODWIN WUCHE & ORS

CHIEF FESTUS SUNMOLA YESUFU V AFRICAN CONTINENTAL BANK LTD
August 1, 2025
NWAFOR OKEGBU V. THE STATE
August 1, 2025
CHIEF FESTUS SUNMOLA YESUFU V AFRICAN CONTINENTAL BANK LTD
August 1, 2025
NWAFOR OKEGBU V. THE STATE
August 1, 2025
Show all

WALTER WIRI & ORS V GODWIN WUCHE & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1980) Legalpedia (SC) 17611

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Jan 25, 1980

Suit Number: SC. 322/1976

CORAM


DANIEL O. IBEKWE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT br/>

OLABODE RHODES-VIVOUR

ANIAGOLU JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

AUGUSTINE NNAMANI, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


WALTER WIRI & ORS APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The plaintiffs/respondents took a writ against the defendants claiming declaration of title to a piece of land, five hundred pounds damages for trespass to the same land and injunction restraining them, their agents or other members of Ibereko Community from continuing trespass on the land. The appellants/defendants, not only denied the claim but also counter-claimed for a declaration of title to the same piece of land and sought forfeiture of the plaintiffs/respondents customary tenancies allegedly held of them by the plaintiffs/respondents, and they also claimed possession. Judgment was given in favor of the plaintiff. Against the judgment, the appellants appealed to Court of Appeal in which the appeal was dismissed. The appellants further appealed to the Supreme Court.


HELD


The appeal was dismissed for lacking in merit.


ISSUES


Whether the Respondents discharged the onus cast upon them by the law to warrant the declaration of customary right of occupancy of the piece of land in dispute made in their favour by the lower Court.

Whether the majority of the Court below was not in error in granting an amendment to the Statement of Claim at the state at which they did so.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


AIM OF PLEADINGS


“The primary aim of pleadings is to settle issues in contention between the parties for trial. The function of the trial Court is to look at the pleadings and arrive at its judgment after hearing all the evidence in support of such pleadings.” Per BELGORE, J.S.C


BURDEN OF PROOF


“The onus is always on the person who asserts to prove.” Per BELGORE, J.S.C


CASES CITED


Walter Wiri & Ors. v. Godwin Wuche & Ors. (1980) 1-2 S.C. 12

Joseph Afolabi & Ors, v. John Adekunle & Anor. (1983) 8 S.C. 98, 117-119; (1983) 2 SCNLR 141


STATUTES REFERRED TO



CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.