THE QUEEN VS GOVERNOR-IN-COUNCIL, WESTERN REGION - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

THE QUEEN VS GOVERNOR-IN-COUNCIL, WESTERN REGION

M.O. ODESANYA VS D.A. EWEDEMI
September 5, 2025
GODWIN IKPEAMOGU NWAUGOAGWU & ANOR VS THE QUEEN
September 5, 2025
M.O. ODESANYA VS D.A. EWEDEMI
September 5, 2025
GODWIN IKPEAMOGU NWAUGOAGWU & ANOR VS THE QUEEN
September 5, 2025
Show all

THE QUEEN VS GOVERNOR-IN-COUNCIL, WESTERN REGION

Legalpedia Citation: (1862-05) Legalpedia 75125 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden at Lagos

Mon May 7, 1962

Suit Number: SC 210/1961

CORAM


ADEMOLA, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

UNSWORTH, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

TAYLOR, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


THE QUEEN

APPELLANTS 


THE GOVERNOR – IN – COUNCIL, WESTERN REGION

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


CHIEFTAINCY TITLE—INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES— ‘MAY’—- APPEAL

 

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant had sent a letter via his lawyer in protest against the recommendation made for the next person to fill the stool of the Awujale of Ijebuland. The respondent never gave a reply to the appellants’ letter. The appellant instituted the action that the respondent was bound to reply his letter of protest. The appellant appealed against the decision of the lower Court being dissatisfied with its finding

 

 


HELD


There being no other grounds of appeal to consider, I would dismiss the appeal with costs.

With regard to the cross-appeal the learned Judge gave no reason why costs were not awarded to the successful party. Costs must follow events. The respondent was entitled to its costs in the Court below. The cross-appeal will be allowed.

In the event the appeal will be dismissed with costs assessed at thirty-five guineas. Costs in the Court below in favour of the respondent is assessed at 25 twenty-five guineas.

 

 


ISSUES


The decision is against the weight of evidence

 

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE PRINCIPLE OF NATURAL JUSTICE


‘The principles of natural Justice must be observed, but, subject to this, I can see no reason why the Minister should not himself direct an enquiry and submit the matter for the consideration of the Governor-in-Council when all necessary information has been obtained.’ Per ADEMOLA CJF

 

 


ABSOLUTE DISCRETION OF THE GOVERNOR -IN -COUNCIL


“The Chiefs Law, to my mind clothes the Governor-in-Council with absolute discretion as to how it arrives at its decision as long as it cannot be established that it was arrived at “mala fide”. Per ADEMOLA CJF

 

 


ABSOLUTE DISCRETION OF THE GOVERNOR -IN -COUNCIL


“The Chiefs Law, to my mind clothes the Governor-in-Council with absolute discretion as to how it arrives at its decision as long as it cannot be established that it was arrived at “mala fide”. Per ADEMOLA CJF

 

 


CASES CITED


Lagunju V Olubadan-in-Council 12 W.A.C.A. 406 at pp.410 and 411

FSC 173/1961, Ex parte Uzoka and 4 others [ 1962] 1 SCNLR 324

 

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


The Chiefs Law, 1957

 

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.