M.O. ODESANYA VS D.A. EWEDEMI - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

M.O. ODESANYA VS D.A. EWEDEMI

L.B. AGUSTO VS P.O. JOSHUA PAGE| 1
September 4, 2025
THE QUEEN VS GOVERNOR-IN-COUNCIL, WESTERN REGION
September 5, 2025
L.B. AGUSTO VS P.O. JOSHUA PAGE| 1
September 4, 2025
THE QUEEN VS GOVERNOR-IN-COUNCIL, WESTERN REGION
September 5, 2025
Show all

M.O. ODESANYA VS D.A. EWEDEMI

Legalpedia Citation: (1962-05) Legalpedia 56304 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden at Lagos

Mon May 28, 1962

Suit Number: SC 238/1961

CORAM


ADEMOLA, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

BAIRAMIAN, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

TAYLOR, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


M.O. ODESANYA

APPELLANTS 


D.A. EWEDEMI

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


LAW OF EVIDENCE—BURDEN OF PROOF

 

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The plaintiff/appellant sued the defendant/respondent asking for a declaration of title, damages for trespass to land and an injunction restraining him.

 

 


HELD


For the above reasons I would dismiss this appeal with costs which I would assess at 20 guineas in favour of the respondent.

 

 


ISSUES


The learned trial Judge misdirected himself when he held “that the only evidence that plaintiff’s father had acted as his agent in the purchase of the land appears to be the plaintiff’s unsupported assertion” when in fact there was supporting evidence

The learned trial Judge misdirected himself when he held “that the area verged yellow is of the same dimensions as that which lies between the eastern side of the area verged red and Alapo Street.

 

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


IN A CLAIM FOR DECLARATION OF TITLE, THE DISPUTED LAND MUST BE ASCERTAINED


In a claim for a declaration of title to land the onus is on the plaintiff to prove title to a defined area to which a declaration can be attached. Per TAYLOR F.J.

 

 


CASES CITED


Not Available

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Not Available

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.