STEPHEN LAWSON-JACK V. THE SHELL PET. DEVELOPMENT CO. OF NIGERIA LIMITED - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

STEPHEN LAWSON-JACK V. THE SHELL PET. DEVELOPMENT CO. OF NIGERIA LIMITED

OSSAI EMEDO V. THE STATE
June 18, 2025
UCHENNA NWACHUKWU V. THE STATE
June 18, 2025
OSSAI EMEDO V. THE STATE
June 18, 2025
UCHENNA NWACHUKWU V. THE STATE
June 18, 2025
Show all

STEPHEN LAWSON-JACK V. THE SHELL PET. DEVELOPMENT CO. OF NIGERIA LIMITED

Legalpedia Citation: (2002) Legalpedia (SC) 11149

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Jul 12, 2002

Suit Number: SC. 54/1998

CORAM


ABUBAKAR BASHIR WALI., JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

UWANI MUSA ABBA AJI

EMMANUEL OLAYINKA AYOOLA, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


STEPHEN LAWSON-JACK APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant raised a preliminary objection to the respondent’s appeal on the grounds that interlocutory appeals no longer go to the Supreme Court under Decree No. 3 of 1999, ruling in the records not certified, records not transmitted within time and that there was no existing lis having filed a notice of discontinuance of the substantive suit.


HELD


The court dismissed the objection and held that the right to appeal accrued before the Decree came into effect and invoked the rules of the court to waive any non- compliance.


ISSUES


The court dismissed the objection and held that the right to appeal accrued before the Decree came into effect and invoked the rules of the court to waive any non- compliance.

ISSUE:
AFRICAN CONTINENTAL BANK LTD. CALABER VS JOSEPH AGBANYM 1960 FSC 267/1959 [1960] NSCC 12
Whether the Court of Appeal was justified in taking into consideration very extraneous matters not forming part of the records or Counsel submissions before it, without more, in resolving the question whether or not there was evidence of an Appeal before it?

Whether Section 74(1)(j) of the Evidence Act which permits judicial Notice of the name of a Judge can be extended to include judicial notice of his signature by an entirely different Court in the resolution of the authenticity of an uncertified document allegedly signed by him?

Whether the Court of Appeal was justified in holding that signed copies of Judgments of another Court sought to be used in a different Court or proceedings in proof of the act of judicial tribunal is primary evidence of one another requiring no certification or by extension whether Photostat copies of such copies require no certification.

Whether the Court of Appeal was justified in holding that there indeed was a lis when the suit upon which an injunction was made pending has ceased to exist 21 days after the Injunction.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


EFFECT OF UNCONTROVERTED AFFIDAVIT


Paragraphs of affidavit not denied nor controverted are deemed admitted -Ogundare J.S.C


CASES CITED


The Council of the University of Ibadan & Anor. v. N. K. Adamolekun (1967) ANLR 225;
Colonial Sugar Refining Co. Ltd. v. Irving (1905) AC 369, 372
Alagbe v. Abimbola (1978) 2 SC 39;
Agbaje v. Ibru S. F. Ltd. (1972) 5 SC 50, 55


STATUTES REFERRED TO


The 1979 Constitution
Decree no 3 of 1999


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.