SAMUEL ETUK VS HERITAGE BANK PLC - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

SAMUEL ETUK VS HERITAGE BANK PLC

TAYLEK DRUGS COMPANY LIMITED v. PETER ONANKPA
April 10, 2025
LAGOS STATE GOVERNMENT & ANOR VS BENEFICIAL ENDOWMENT LTD
April 10, 2025
TAYLEK DRUGS COMPANY LIMITED v. PETER ONANKPA
April 10, 2025
LAGOS STATE GOVERNMENT & ANOR VS BENEFICIAL ENDOWMENT LTD
April 10, 2025
Show all

SAMUEL ETUK VS HERITAGE BANK PLC

Legalpedia Citation: (2018) Legalpedia (CA) 21169

In the Court of Appeal

hj

Mon Oct 29, 2018

Suit Number: CA/L/05/2010

CORAM



PARTIES


kjkj 2ND DEFENDANT / APPELLANT


jkkj CLAIMANT DEFENDANT


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Appellant, a legal practitioner, instituted proceedings before the High Court of Lagos State, claiming the sum of N681, 274.54, being the balance of his professional fees for services rendered to the Respondent, interest on the said sum at the rate of 21% per annum from 1st December 2003 until the sum is paid up. At the conclusion of the hearing, the court entered judgment in part for the Appellant, that the sum due and payable to him is N100, 000.00, being fees payable for the obtaining of an order from the Federal High Court. The court in dismissing the other claims of the Appellant ordered the Defendant to pay 21% interest on the said sum and thereafter at 10% per annum until the sum is totally liquidated. Being dissatisfied with the judgment of the trial court, the Appellant appealed to this Court whilst the Respondent filed a cross appeal.


HELD


Appeal Dismissed, Cross Appeal Succeeds in Part


ISSUES


MAIN APPEAL ? Whether or not the learned trial judge was right, in law and on the facts, in holding that the Appellant was not entitled to the sum of N741, 274.62. CROSS APPEAL ? Whether the award of the sum of N100, 000 plus interest at 21% per annum from 14/7/2003 till 18/9/2009 and thereafter at 10% per annum until liquidation is justified in law and on the facts having regard to the evidence and issues contested at the trial court.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


Ratio one


Ration one body


CASES CITED



STATUTES REFERRED TO



CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.