SAMUEL EREKANURE VS THE STATE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

SAMUEL EREKANURE VS THE STATE

AFRICAN CONTINENTAL BANK PLC VS OBMIAMI BRICK AND STONE
July 9, 2025
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OGUN STATE & ANOR V. CHIEF A.B COKER
July 9, 2025
AFRICAN CONTINENTAL BANK PLC VS OBMIAMI BRICK AND STONE
July 9, 2025
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OGUN STATE & ANOR V. CHIEF A.B COKER
July 9, 2025
Show all

SAMUEL EREKANURE VS THE STATE

Legalpedia Citation: (1993) Legalpedia (SC) 71711

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Jun 11, 1993

Suit Number: SC. 258/1991

CORAM


D.O. EDOZIE

MUHAMMADU LAWAL UWAIS, J.S.C, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT (Presided)

SALIHU MODIBBO ALFA BELGORE, J.S.C, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ABUBAKAR BASHIR WALI, J.S.C, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

JUMMAI HANNATU SANKEY


PARTIES


SAMUEL EREKANURE APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant was arraigned before the trial court on a charge of murder. He was found guilty, convicted and sentenced to death. The appellant appealed on grounds that his arraignment was not in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Law of the Bendel State of Nigeria, 1976.


HELD


The Court held that the first trial was a nullity for non-compliance with Section 215 of the Criminal Procedure Law of Bendel State and also a clear breach of Section 33(6) of the 1979 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The Court also ordered a fresh trial of the appellant.


ISSUES


What is the consequential order to make when a trial Judge fails to adhere strictly to the provisions of Section 215 of the Criminal Procedure Law, Cap. 49, Laws of the Bendel State of Nigeria.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


REASONS FOR ORDERING FRESH TRIAL


The reason for ordering a fresh trial in cases of nullity is the interest of justice where the facts presented were such to allow the appellant to walk out of the court as a free man may amount to a miscarriage of justice more so where the facts showed that an offence had been committed – Olatawura, JSC.


AFRICAN CONTINENTAL BANK LTD. CALABER VS JOSEPH AGBANYM 1960 FSC 267/1959 [1960] NSCC 12 WHAT CONSTITUTES FAIR TRIAL


A man who does not know or understand the details of the nature of the offence with which he is charged and who was subsequently convicted cannot be said to have had a fair trial – Olatawura, JSC.


CASES CITED


1. Eyorokoromo v. The State (1979) 6-9 S.C. 3.
2. Sunday Kajubo v. The State (1988) 3 S.C. 132; (1988) 1 NWLR (PL73) 721.
3. Abedundu & 4 Ors v. The Queen (1959) 4 F.S.C. 70/1-72: (1959) SCNLR 162.


STATUTES REFERRED TO


1. The Supreme Court Act 1960
2. Criminal Procedure Law, CAP.49 Laws of Bendel State of Nigeria
3. The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1979


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.