S.O.AJANAKU V. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

S.O.AJANAKU V. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

PIUS JIZURUMBA V. THE STATE
August 7, 2025
CHIEF A.N. ONYIUKE III V. G. F. OKEKE
August 7, 2025
PIUS JIZURUMBA V. THE STATE
August 7, 2025
CHIEF A.N. ONYIUKE III V. G. F. OKEKE
August 7, 2025
Show all

S.O.AJANAKU V. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (1976) Legalpedia (SC) 00671

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Tue Mar 9, 1976

Suit Number: SC. 1/1979

CORAM


GEORGE S. SOWEMIMO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

MOHAMMED BELLO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ANTHONY A. ANIAGOLU, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


S.O. AJANAKU APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

An application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court was brought by the applicant from a conviction on conspiracy that was affirmed by the Federal Court of Appeal.


HELD


In a criminal proceeding jurisdiction to hear an appeal under Section 117 subsection (5) originates from the certificate of the Attorney-General where this has been granted under Section 31 sub-section (1) of the Federal Court of Appeal Decree 1976. The certificate of the Attorney-General, as we have earlier on mentioned, has not been obtained before the matter came before this court. In the circumstances, therefore, the papers before us do not come within the provisions of the law referred to earlier on, that is Section 31(1) of Decree No. 43 and Section 117(5) of Decree No. 42, and the matter is therefore struck out.


ISSUES


Whether the Supreme Court can entertain a notice of application for leave to appeal in a criminal matter without the applicant obtaining the Certificate of the Attorney-General of the Federation authorizing a further appeal to this court.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


PROCEDURE FOR APPEALS IN RESPECT OF A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING


No appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court from any decision of Federal Court of Appeal in respect of a criminal proceeding without the Attorney-General of the Federation granting a certificate to that effect. Sowemimo JSC


CASES CITED


1. Milne v. Commissioner of Police for City of London (1940) AC. page 1

2. Ex parte Blackburn (1956) 3 All ER page 334 at page 337

3. Rex v. W. H. Ball (1911) AC page 47 at page 62:-


STATUTES REFERRED TO


1. The Constitution (Amendment) Decree No. 42 of 1976

2. Federal Court of Appeal Decrees No. 43 of 1976

3. Supreme Court Rules

4. The English Criminal Appeal Act 1907 (Cap. 23) and Criminal Justice Act 1925. Section 1(6) of that Act (1907 Act) reads


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.