PAUL ONOCHIE AND ORS VS THE REPUBLIC - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

PAUL ONOCHIE AND ORS VS THE REPUBLIC

NORTHERN ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD VS STEPHEN IDUGBOE
September 2, 2025
ARNOLD NWAFIA VS NWANAKUO UBUBA
September 2, 2025
NORTHERN ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD VS STEPHEN IDUGBOE
September 2, 2025
ARNOLD NWAFIA VS NWANAKUO UBUBA
September 2, 2025
Show all

PAUL ONOCHIE AND ORS VS THE REPUBLIC

Legalpedia Citation: (1966-03) Legalpedia 83362 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden At Abuja

Thu Mar 10, 1966

Suit Number: SC 625/1964


CORAM


BAIRAMIAN CHIEF JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


PAUL ONOCHIE AND ORS

APPELLANTS 


THE REPUBLIC

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


Criminal law- Conspiracy -burden of proof 

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The applicants were convicted by Sowemimo J. for breaking into a store of the United Bank for Africa in the small hours of the night between the 26th and 27th May, 1963 and stealing two bales of pieces of cotton prints. That was the 2nd count. In regard to the 1st count, which accused them of having conspired to break in and steal 

 


HELD


That the learned judge ought to have convicted them on the 1st count of conspiring to break in 

 


ISSUES


Whether the trial court was right to have discharged the accused persons acquitted? 

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


PROOF OF CONSPIRACY


 If two or more persons break into a store in company, it must be because they had conspired so to do. Sometimes there is direct and distinct evidence on the hatching of the plot: an accomplice or informer is called by the prosecution and he gives evidence of it; but such evidence is not indispensable. It is open to the trial court to infer a conspiracy from the fact of doing things towards a common end.-Per Bairamian, J.S.C.

 


CASES CITED



STATUTES REFERRED TO



CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.