OYIBO IRIRI & ORS VS ESERORAYE ERHURHOBARE & ANOR - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

OYIBO IRIRI & ORS VS ESERORAYE ERHURHOBARE & ANOR

JOHN EKEOGU VS ELIZABETH ALIRI
July 14, 2025
ALHAJI AHMED AYUB-KHAN VS THE STATE
July 14, 2025
JOHN EKEOGU VS ELIZABETH ALIRI
July 14, 2025
ALHAJI AHMED AYUB-KHAN VS THE STATE
July 14, 2025
Show all

OYIBO IRIRI & ORS VS ESERORAYE ERHURHOBARE & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (1991) Legalpedia (SC) 91110

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Mar 1, 1991

Suit Number: SC. 214/1987

CORAM


MUHAMMAD S. MUNTAKA-COOMASSIE (Lead Judgment), JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ADOLPHUS GODWIN KARIBI-WHYTE,JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

SALIHU MODIBBO ALFA BELGORE,JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

MUHAMMADU LAWAL UWAIS JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

SYLVESTER UMARU ONU IGUH JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


1. OYIBO IRIRI2. SADI IRIRI3. OGBERODIORAYE IRIRI4. AKPENSUOME AKPOME5. BEBEDICT ONOKPASA (For themselves and behalf of the Idiemo family) APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appeal is against the concurrent decision of the two lower courts who found for the respondent in a dispute over a piece of land. The parties relied on traditional history to prove their claims. In a considered judgment, the Supreme Court held as follows:


HELD


The appeal was dismissed.


ISSUES


(i) Whether the learned justices of the Court of Appeal were right in affirming the decision of the teamed trial Judge to reject the traditional evidence of the appellants?(ii) Whether the learned Justices of the Court of Appeal were right in failing to hold that the learned trial Judge did not consider properly and/or at all the evidence of acts of possession given by the appellants?(iii) Whether the learned Justices of the Court of Appeal were right in failing to hold that the learned trial Judge did not consider properly and/or at all the evidence of ownership of surrounding parcels of land given by the appellants?(iv)Whether Exhibit ‘K’ was not an admission to which some probative value ought to have been given?


RATIONES DECIDENDI


DUTY OF A TRIAL JUDGE


“It is the duty of the trial Judge to evaluate the evidence and to make primary findings of fact. This duty, unless it is shown not to have been done according to well laid down principles of law, an appeal court cannot interfere with such findings” (Per Olatawura, J.S.C.)


CASES CITED


1. Obi I. Ezewani v. Obi Onwordi (1986) 4 NWLR (Pt.33) 272. Nigerian Bottling Co. Ltd. v. Constance O. Ngonadi (1985) 5 S.C.317,319; (1985) 1 NWLR (Pt.4) 739.3. Ibanga v. Usanga (1982) 5 S.C. 103; Kuforiji v. V. Y. B. Ltd. (1981) 6-7 S.C. 404. Akpapuna v. Nzeka II (1983) 2 SCNLR 1.5. Adeniji & Ors. v. Tawa Adeniji Mrs. (1972) 1 All N.L.R. (Pt.1) 298.


STATUTES REFERRED TO


None.


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.