OLAWOYIN J. S. VS COMMISSION OF POLICE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

OLAWOYIN J. S. VS COMMISSION OF POLICE

MERCHANTS BANK LTD VS FEDERAL MINISTER OF FINANCE
September 8, 2025
OMOHODION OBADENEJI VS COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
September 8, 2025
MERCHANTS BANK LTD VS FEDERAL MINISTER OF FINANCE
September 8, 2025
OMOHODION OBADENEJI VS COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
September 8, 2025
Show all

OLAWOYIN J. S. VS COMMISSION OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (1961-10) Legalpedia 52891 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden at Lagos

Fri Oct 27, 1961

Suit Number: SC. 327/1961

CORAM


ADEMOLA, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

MBANEFO, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

BRETT, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


APPELLANTS


COMMISSION OF POLICE

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – REFERENCE OF A POINT OF LAW- SECTION 108 THE NIGERIA (CONSTITUTION) ORDER IN COUNCIL, 1960

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellants applied for reference of the application of the constitution as it relates to their rights during a criminal trial to the Federal Supreme Court under section 108 the Nigeria (Constitution) Order in Council, 1960.

 

 


HELD


The court held that no substantial issue was raised and that what is referable is the question of interpretation of the constitution and not its application to particular facts.

 

 


ISSUES


Whether the appellants’ application for reference to the Federal Supreme Court is competent under section 108 the Nigeria (Constitution) Order in Council, 1960.

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


THE PURPORT OF SECTION 108 THE NIGERIA (CONSTITUTION) ORDER IN COUNCIL, 1960.


‘The first requirement for a reference under section 108(2) is that a question should be raised as to the interpretation of the Constitution. Secondly, the Court must be satisfied that the question involves a substantial question of law.’ Per Mbanefo, C.J.E.R

 


MEANING OF SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW


‘In order to be substantial, the issue must be such that there may be some doubt or difference of opinion as to what the law is. When no such doubts exists, or the law is well established by a final Court of Appeal, or by an overwhelming consensus of judicial decisions, the mere application of it to a particular set of facts does not constitute a substantial question of law.’ Per Mbanefo, C.J.E.R

 


CASES CITED


Otuguor Gamioba and Others v. Esezi 11, The

Ohiara v. C.P. Syndicate, (1949), 4 D.L.R. 20 (Bom).

Abdur Rahman v. Raghbir, (1951), 6 D.L.R. lm (Simla)Onodfie of Okpe, and Others – (FSC. 120/1961),(1961) All N.L.R. 584.

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


The Nigeria (Constitution) Order in Council, 1960

 

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.