MOHAMOUD J. LABABEDI VS LAGOS METAL INDUSTRIES (NIG.) LTD
August 15, 2025OKWO EJIOFOR VS EZE ONYEKWE
August 15, 2025Legalpedia Citation: (1972) Legalpedia (SC) 31431
In the Supreme Court of Nigeria
Wed Dec 20, 1972
Suit Number: SC.21/72
CORAM
COKER JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT
SOWEMIMO JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT
IRIKEFE JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT
PARTIES
OGUMOLA OJO APPELLANTS
RESPONDENTS
AREA(S) OF LAW
SUMMARY OF FACTS
The Appellant engaged in a fight with one Bernadette Onwuliri his wife ( now deceased), the deceased died as a result of injuries she sustained which was inflicted on her by the Appellant. At the trial, the appellant was found guilty as charged, convicted and sentenced to death for murder of the deceased, he therefore appeal against his conviction.
HELD
The court held that, in a case of murder, a court of law is duty bound to consider all the defences raised by the accused, and it is not obliged to speculate on possible defences open to the accused person except such was raised before it, going by the evidence in this case, the conviction and sentence of the appellant for murder was proper in the circumstance.
ISSUES
It was argued by learned counsel for the appellant that a defence of insanity was raised but was not considered by the learned trial Judge as it ought to have been considered.
RATIONES DECIDENDI
DUTY OF COURT TO CONSIDER DEFENCES BROUGHT BEFORE IT
A court of law is duty bound to consider defence(s) raised by the accused be it plausible or not as long as it is fairly raised before it. PER COKER JSC
CASES CITED
STATUTES REFERRED TO