OBONG (BARR) VICTOR AKPAN & ANOR V HON. (BARR) ONOFTOK AKPAN LUKE & 2 ORS - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

OBONG (BARR) VICTOR AKPAN & ANOR V HON. (BARR) ONOFTOK AKPAN LUKE & 2 ORS

ALHAJI JIKA UMARU VS KASSIMU ALHAJI YAHAYA
April 28, 2025
JAFAR ABUBAKAR VS ALHAJI IBRAHIM HASSAN DANKWAMBO
April 28, 2025
ALHAJI JIKA UMARU VS KASSIMU ALHAJI YAHAYA
April 28, 2025
JAFAR ABUBAKAR VS ALHAJI IBRAHIM HASSAN DANKWAMBO
April 28, 2025
Show all

OBONG (BARR) VICTOR AKPAN & ANOR V HON. (BARR) ONOFTOK AKPAN LUKE & 2 ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (2022-04) Legalpedia 55024 (CA)

In the Court of Appeal

HOLDEN AT ABUJA

Wed Oct 21, 2015

Suit Number: CAM/EPT/539/2015

CORAM


ABUBAKAR D.YAHAYA JUSTICE, COURT OF APPEAL

TANI Y.HASSAN JUSTICE, COURT OF APPEAL

JOSEPH E. EKANEM JUSTICE, COURT OF APPEAL


PARTIES


1. OBONG (BARR) VICTOR AKPAN

2. ALL PROGRESSIVE CONGRESS (APC)

APPELLANTS 


1. HON. (BARR) ONOFTOK AKPAN LUKE

2. PEOPLES DEMOCRATIC PARTY (POP)

3. INDEPENDENT NATIONAL ELECTORAL COMMISSION (INEC)

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


APPEAL, COURT, ELECTION PETITION, JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE, STARE DECISIS

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

In an election into the Akwa Ibom State National Assembly. The 1st Respondent was declared the winner in respect of Nsit Ubium State Constituency by the 3rd Respondent. Dissatisfied with the result of the election, the Appellants who also contested in the election filed a Petition before the Akwa Ibom State National Houses of Assembly Tribunal sitting at Abuja. The Tribunal, struck out the Petition of the Appellants herein for being statute barred, having been filed out of time.  Aggrieved, the Appellants have  appealed to the Court of Appeal.

 


HELD


Appeal Dismissed

 


ISSUES


Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that the Petition, the subject matter of this appeal was filed out of time, by virtue of Section 285(5) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


WHETHER THE ISSUE OF JURISDICTION OF A TRIBUNAL CAN BE RAISED AT ANY TIME


“I am in complete agreement with the respondents that it was a matter of jurisdiction of the Tribunal and could be taken at any time, and even orally. This is because it would be a sheer waste of judicial time, for a court or tribunal to adjudicate on a matter it has no jurisdiction upon. The proceedings would be a nullity Nwankwo Vs. Yar’adua (2010)12 NWLR (Pt. 1209)518; Udokpo Vs. Archibong (Supra) and Nuhu Vs. Ogele (Supra). The Tribunal was therefore right when it entertained the Motion for striking out the Petition, at the time it did, since it was challenging the jurisdiction of the Tribunal to entertain same.” PER A.D. YAHAYA, J.C.A

 


CASES CITED


None

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Constitution of The Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended)

Electoral Act 2010

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.