NYONG EMMANUEL OBOT VS CENTRAL BANK OF NIGERIA - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

NYONG EMMANUEL OBOT VS CENTRAL BANK OF NIGERIA

SAMUEL ADIGUN VS I.O. AYINDE & ORS
July 9, 2025
CHIEF J. A. OJOMO VS INCAR (NIG.) LTD.
July 9, 2025
SAMUEL ADIGUN VS I.O. AYINDE & ORS
July 9, 2025
CHIEF J. A. OJOMO VS INCAR (NIG.) LTD.
July 9, 2025
Show all

NYONG EMMANUEL OBOT VS CENTRAL BANK OF NIGERIA

Legalpedia Citation: (1993-09) Legalpedia 87214 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden At Abuja

Thu Sep 30, 1993

Suit Number: SC.85/1989


CORAM


M.L. UWAIS JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

S. KAWU JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

A.B. WALI JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

I.L. KUTIGI JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

S.U.MOHAMMED. JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


NYONG EMMANUEL OBOT

APPELLANTS 


 CENTRAL BANK OF NIGERIA

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


LAW OF CONTRACT—WRONGFUL DIMISSAL— APPEAL

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant/plaintiff was a staff of the respondent/defendant was dismissed after 21 years of service based on the findings and subsequent recommendations by the Disciplinary Committee into allegations of misconduct which was not in the interest of the Organisation. He was not present when 8 of the 9 witnesses testified against him.

 


HELD


The Court held that the appellant was wrongly dismissed by the respondent. The appellant is entitled to general damages assessed at N991.67k being payment of one month’s salary in lieu of notice. The appellant is entitled to pension and gratuity as damages to be worked out by the respondent on the basis of the formula stated above.

 


ISSUES



RATIONES DECIDENDI


ELEMENT OF FAIR-HEARING


One of the essential elements of fair hearing is that the body investigating the charge (in this case of misconduct) must not receive evidence on representation behind the back of the person being investigated. Per Oputa JSC

 


MEASURE OF DAMAGES IN A CLAIM FOR WRONGFUL DISMISSAL


In a claim for wrongful dismissal the measurement of damages is prima facie the amount that the plaintiff would have earned had the employment continued according to contract. Per Uwais JSC

 


CASES CITED


1. Akeredolu v. Akinremi (1989) 3 NWLR (Pt.108) 164 at p.172 F-G

2. Williamson v. London & North Western Rly Company (1879) 12 Ch.D. 787 at p.794

3. Hall v. Eve (1876) 4 Ch.D. 341

4. Aiyetan v. NIFOR (1987) 3 NWLR (Pt.59) 48

5. Olatubosun v. NISER Council (1988) 3 NWLR (Pt.80) 25

6. Adigun v. A.-G. of Oyo State (1987) 1 NWLR (Pt. 53) 678 at p.709F

7. Nigerian Marketing Board v. Adewunmi (1972) 11 SC 111 at p.117; (1972) NSCC 662 at p.665

8. Denmark Production Ltd. v. Boscobel Productions Ltd. (1968) 1 All ER 513 at p.524

9. English Exporters (London) Ltd. v. Ayanda (1973) NSCC 123 at p.126 

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


1. High Court Rules of Cross River State

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.