NWORIE NWALI VS THE STATE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

NWORIE NWALI VS THE STATE

YUNUSA ADAMU & ORS VS THE STATE
July 11, 2025
RAPHAEL AGU VS CHRISTIAN OZURUMBA IKEWEBE
July 11, 2025
YUNUSA ADAMU & ORS VS THE STATE
July 11, 2025
RAPHAEL AGU VS CHRISTIAN OZURUMBA IKEWEBE
July 11, 2025
Show all

NWORIE NWALI VS THE STATE

Legalpedia Citation: (1991) Legalpedia (SC) 18188

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri May 3, 1991

Suit Number: SC. 31/1990

CORAM


MICHAEL EKUNDARE OGUNDARE JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT (Read the Leading Judgment)

UWAIS,JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

AKPATA JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

KAWU,JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


NWORIE NWALI APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant was charged with murder. The trial court found him guilty, his appeal to the Court of Appeal was dismissed, hence this further appeal. ?


HELD


Appeal dismissed


ISSUES


(1) Was it right for the learned Justice of the Court of Appeal to rely on the English version of the appellant’s statement where both the English version and the Ibo version were tendered in the High Court? (2) Whether the Court of Appeal rightly supported the rejection of the appellant’s plea of self defence, and provocation. (3) Whether conviction is supported by the evidence before the court. (4) (As an aside) Whether the Honorable Judge of the High Court rightly held that a confessional statement not endorsed by a Senior Police Officer is inadmissible.?


RATIONES DECIDENDI


LANGUAGE OF THE COURT


“In our judicial system, and because Nigerians of different tribes now administer justice, the proceedings in the court of trial must of necessity be recorded in English language. The set-up of our courts demands that the English language will still be used. It is for this reason that when a statement is recorded in vernacular from a witness or an accused, there is always an English translation.” PER OLATAWURA, JSC


REASON MUST BE GIVEN WHY A CONVICTION CANNOT STAND


“A State counsel or any other law officer who appears on appeal involving conviction has the right to announce his inability to support the conviction by the trial court. No court is bound to accept the submission once satisfied that there are valid grounds why the conviction should be affirmed. The State counsel making such a submission is enjoined to give reasons why the conviction cannot stand.” PER OLATAWURA, JSC


CASES CITED



STATUTES REFERRED TO



CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.