NORTHERN ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD VS STEPHEN IDUGBOE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

NORTHERN ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD VS STEPHEN IDUGBOE

ALHAJI MUSTAFA ALI VS MRS. A. A ALLEN
September 2, 2025
PAUL ONOCHIE AND ORS VS THE REPUBLIC
September 2, 2025
ALHAJI MUSTAFA ALI VS MRS. A. A ALLEN
September 2, 2025
PAUL ONOCHIE AND ORS VS THE REPUBLIC
September 2, 2025
Show all

NORTHERN ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD VS STEPHEN IDUGBOE

Legalpedia Citation: (1966-03) Legalpedia 75104 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden At Abuja

Fri Mar 25, 1966

Suit Number: SC 583/1964


CORAM


BRETT JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ONYEAMA JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

AJEGBO JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


NORTHERN ASSURANCE COMPANY  LTD

APPELLANTS 


 STEPHEN IDUGBOE

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The plaintiff/respondent commenced an action against the defendant Company, who are the appellants in the High Court of Western Nigeria on the 9th of December, 1963, claiming £1,200 under an alleged policy of insurance. 

leged policy of insurance. 

 


HELD


That filling up the form they were the agents of the person making the proposal, that is, the plaintiff. 

 


ISSUES


Whether there was a material non-disclosure of fact on the proposal form which formed the basis of the contract? 

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


DUTY OF AGENTS OF AN INSURANCE COMPANIES


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41

‘The agent of an insurance company cannot be treated as their agent to invent the answers to the questions in the proposal form; and that, if he is allowed by the proposer to invent the answers, and to send them as the answers of the proposer, the agent is, to that extent, the agent, not of the insurance company, but of the proposer.’ -Per Onyeama, J.S.C.
 

 


CASES CITED


Newsholnre Brothers v. Road Transport & Co. Ltd. [ 1929] 2 K.B. 356
Golding v. Royal London Auxiliary Insurance Co. Ltd. (1914) 30 T.L.R. 350

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO



CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.