NATHANIEL NASAMU V. THE STATE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

NATHANIEL NASAMU V. THE STATE

METAL CONSTRUCTION (W.A.) LTD & 2 ORS V. MIGLIORE
August 1, 2025
OBIANWUNA OGBUNYIYA & ORS V. OBI OKUDO
August 1, 2025
METAL CONSTRUCTION (W.A.) LTD & 2 ORS V. MIGLIORE
August 1, 2025
OBIANWUNA OGBUNYIYA & ORS V. OBI OKUDO
August 1, 2025
Show all

NATHANIEL NASAMU V. THE STATE

Legalpedia Citation: (1979) Legalpedia (SC) 13161

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Sep 28, 1979

Suit Number: SC. 38/1978

CORAM


GEORGE S. SOWEMIMO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

DANIEL O. IBEKWE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT br/>

OLABODE RHODES-VIVOUR

KAYODE ESO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ANTHONY N. ANIAGOLU, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


NATHANIEL NASAMU APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant, a soldier by profession, was convicted of the murder by the Lagos High Court. He was accordingly sentenced to death. He appealed against the conviction and sentence to the Federal Court of Appeal, after hearing arguments on the grounds of appeal filed by the appellant, dismissed his appeal. It was against the judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal that the appellant appealed to the Supreme Court.


HELD


The appeal was dismissed due to lack of merit.


ISSUES


Whether the act of the appellant in firing the shot was intentional or accidental and as we have earlier said, learned counsel relied for the determination of this on the alleged contradictions in the evidence of the prosecution witnesses.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT ON CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE.


“What is important is that there is proof beyond reasonable doubt on circumstantial evidence.” Per ESO, JSC.


DUTY OF COURT WHERE THE PROSECUTION IS BASED ON CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE


“We would like to emphasize that there is no rule that where the prosecution is based on circumstantial evidence, the Judge must, as a matter of law, not convict unless he is satisfied that the facts proved are not only consistent with the guilt of the accused but also such as to be inconsistent with any other reasonable conclusion.” per ESO, JSC.


ASSESSMENT OF CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES


“it is trite law, that a trial court is in the best position to assess the credibility of witnesses.” Per ESO, JSC.


CASES CITED


Khadar & Anor. v. The Republic (1978) 2 Cyprus L.R. p. 132.

The Military Governor, Western State v. Chief Afolabi Laniba and Anor. (1974) 10 S.C. 227 at 233


STATUTES REFERRED TO



CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.