NAFIU RABIU V KANO STATE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

NAFIU RABIU V KANO STATE

CORPORAL JONA DAWA & ANOR V THE STATE
July 30, 2025
ALHAJI RAIMI EDUN VS ODAN COMMUNITY & ORS
July 30, 2025
CORPORAL JONA DAWA & ANOR V THE STATE
July 30, 2025
ALHAJI RAIMI EDUN VS ODAN COMMUNITY & ORS
July 30, 2025
Show all

NAFIU RABIU V KANO STATE

Legalpedia Citation: (1980) Legalpedia (SC) 65151

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Nov 21, 1980

Suit Number: SC. 49/1980

CORAM


SOWEMIMO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

SIR UDO UDOMA, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

OLABODE RHODES-VIVOUR

ANIAGOLU JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

KAYODE ESO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

AUGUSTINE NNAMANI, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

MOHAMMED BELLO, CHIEF JUSTICE OF NIGERIA


PARTIES


NAFIU RABIU APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant was charged with culpable homicide punishable with death for the death of the deceased, his wife. Medical evidence showed that the deceased was strangled at a time when only the appellant had access to her. The trial court acquitted the appellant. On appeal, the appellant was convicted for culpable homicide not punishable with death.


HELD


The court dismissed the appeal and held that the prosecutor had a right of appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal from an order of acquittal on point of law which was the point raised in the appeal.


ISSUES


whether a right of appeal from an order of acquittal in a criminal proceedings is available to the prosecutor.whether or not it has been clearly established that the deceased died by strangulation or whether there is any lingering doubt that she may have died from alcoholic poisoning? .whether the Court of Appeal was right in the conclusion which it reached that the appellant was guilty of culpable homicide not punishable with death


RATIONES DECIDENDI


RIGHT OF PROSECUTOR TO APPEAL IN CRIMINAL CASES


The prosecutor in the Northern States has a right of appeal from an order of acquittal, made by a High Court sitting at first instance, in criminal proceedings but only on points of law – Idigbe J.S.C.


POWER OF APPEAL COURT TO SET ASIDE A FINDING WHICH IS PERVERSE


if a jury (or a judge sitting also as jury) came to a decision which no reasonable jury applying their minds to proper considerations and giving themselves proper directions, (against non-directions, as is also the case here) can come, then an appeal court having jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from such a decision only on a point of law, will reverse such a decision because the position then is exactly the same as if the jury (or the judge sitting as a jury) have come to a decision of fact which no evidence whatsoever supports and such a decision must be considered erroneous in law, and also perverse.” – Idigbe J.S.C


CASES CITED


Yekini Onigbeden v. Ishola Balogun (1975) 1 all NLR 233 at 241

National Employers Mutual General Insurance Association v. Uchav (1973) 1 NMLR 170 at 172-3

Kiren v. Paschal and Ludwig Incorporate (1978) 11 and 12 S. C. 77

Bracegirdle v. Oxley (1947) 1 All ER 126


STATUTES REFERRED TO


The 1979 Constitution.

The Criminal Procedure Code


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.