MISR (NIGERIA) LTD. V. SALAH EL ASSAD - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

MISR (NIGERIA) LTD. V. SALAH EL ASSAD

UFOT GEORGE & ORS V. THE STATE
August 27, 2025
SOLICITOR-GENERAL WESTERN NIGERIA V. DR FESTUS ADEBONOJO & ORS
August 27, 2025
UFOT GEORGE & ORS V. THE STATE
August 27, 2025
SOLICITOR-GENERAL WESTERN NIGERIA V. DR FESTUS ADEBONOJO & ORS
August 27, 2025
Show all

MISR (NIGERIA) LTD. V. SALAH EL ASSAD

Legalpedia Citation: (1971) Legalpedia (SC) 91161

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri May 21, 1971

Suit Number: SC 2/1970

CORAM


COKER, CHIEF JUSTICE NIGERIA

SOWEMIMO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

UDOMA, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


MISR (NIGERIA) LTD APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The plaintiff who was claiming damages for breach of contract against the defendant instituted this action despite the fact that the matter was subject to arbitration. The plaintiff stated that there had already been an abortive arbitration, and that he had unsuccessfully sought the assistance of the court to appoint an arbitrator, so in the circumstances was entitled to proceed to court.


HELD


The Court ordered that the action of the plaintiffs in this matter be stayed indefinitely in accordance with the provisions of section 5 of the Arbitration Act, Cap. 13


ISSUES


Whether court can treat the arbitration clause in the contract between the parties as unenforceable and therefore discountenance it in the enforcement of rights under the contract

Whether the learned trial judge wrongly held that an arbitration had already taken place and failed, whereas the ground on which Lambo J. had set aside the arbitration award was that the appointment of the sole arbitrator was irregular.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


SANCTITY OF CONTRACT BETWEEN PARTIES


But the contract of the parties still remains their contract and it will be asking too much of any court to sanction an unwarranted departure from the terms of a contract into which two free and able parties entered unless such a contract or any part of it has been lawfully abrogated or discharged. Per Coker, JSC


SANCTITY OF CONTRACT BETWEEN PARTIES


But the contract of the parties still remains their contract and it will be asking too much of any court to sanction an unwarranted departure from the terms of a contract into which two free and able parties entered unless such a contract or any part of it has been lawfully abrogated or discharged. Per Coker, JSC<foo< p=””></foo<>


CASES CITED


Cameron v. Cuddy and Anor, (1914) A.C. 651.


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Arbitration Act, Cap. 13 (Laws of the Federation of Nigeria)

Rules of the Supreme Court. Order 7 rule 13


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.