MILITARY ADMINISTRATOR OF BENUE STATE V. ULEGEDE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

MILITARY ADMINISTRATOR OF BENUE STATE V. ULEGEDE

ESSANG V. AUREOL PLASTICS LTD
June 20, 2025
TINUBU V IMB SECURITIES
June 20, 2025
ESSANG V. AUREOL PLASTICS LTD
June 20, 2025
TINUBU V IMB SECURITIES
June 20, 2025
Show all

MILITARY ADMINISTRATOR OF BENUE STATE V. ULEGEDE

Legalpedia Citation: (2001) Legalpedia (SC) 21431

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Oct 19, 2001

Suit Number: SC.267/2000

CORAM


OBASEKI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

ALOYSIUS IYORGYER KATSINA-ALU. JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

EMMANUEL OLAYINKA AYOOLA, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


1. THE MILITARY ADMINISTRATOR OF BENUE STATE2. THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL, BENUE STATE3. THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, BENUE STATE4. THE DIRECTOR-GENERAL ESTABLISHMENT AND SERVICE MATTERS, BENUE STATE5. MR TIVLUMU NYITSE, PRESS SECRETARY TO THE MILITARY ADMINISTRATOR, BENUE STATE6. RADIO BENUE7. BOARD OF RADIO BENUE8. BENUE PRINTING AND PUBLISHING COMPANY LTD APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

Respondent sued Appellant ,claiming in the main, a declaration that their several purported retirement were premature, mala fide , improper, unconstitutional, null and void. And not done according to Decree No. 17 of 1984 or other law applicable to the contract of employment of the respondents


HELD


The court held that retirement of the respondents was void because of non-compliance with the provisions of the statute. ?


ISSUES


Whether where an issue has been raised and conclusively determined at an earlier stage of a proceeding, the same issue is available for fresh consideration and determination at a later stage. “Whether the compulsory retirement of the appellants was made in compliance with the Public Officers (Special Provisions) Act Cap 381 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria to enjoy the protection of the ouster clause therein.”


RATIONES DECIDENDI


SETTING ASIDE APPEAL


I venture to think that a decision is conclusive as to what it determines when it can only be set aside on an appeal being brought for that purpose Per AYOOLA, J.S.C.


JURISDICTION


The learned trial Judge was in error to have re-opened the question of his jurisdiction under the Act when the said issue had been conclusively settled by the Court of Appeal judgment, which was still subsisting Per AYOOLA, J.S.C.


CASES CITED


Skenconsult (Nig.) Ltd. v. Ukey 12 NSCC 1.FCDA v. Sule (1994) 3 SCNJ 71; (1994) 3 NWLR (Pt 332) 257,


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Public Officers (Special Provisions) Decree No. 17 of 1984 (Cap 381, LFN 1990)?


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.