METAL CONSTRUCTION (W.A.) LTD & 2 ORS V. MIGLIORE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

METAL CONSTRUCTION (W.A.) LTD & 2 ORS V. MIGLIORE

NATHANIEL NASAMU VS THE STATE
August 1, 2025
CHIEF OBAFEMI AWOLOWO V. ALHAJI SHEHU SHAGARI & ORS
August 1, 2025
NATHANIEL NASAMU VS THE STATE
August 1, 2025
CHIEF OBAFEMI AWOLOWO V. ALHAJI SHEHU SHAGARI & ORS
August 1, 2025
Show all

METAL CONSTRUCTION (W.A.) LTD & 2 ORS V. MIGLIORE

Legalpedia Citation: (1979) Legalpedia (SC) 11158

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Sep 28, 1979

Suit Number: SC. 35/1979

CORAM


GEORGE S. SOWEMIMO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ADIO,JUSTICE, ,UPREME COURT

OLABODE RHODES-VIVOUR

KAYODE ESO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

AYO GABRIEL IRIKEFE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


1. METAL CONSTRUCTION (W.A) LTD. ) 2. TAIWO OKEOWO 3. OLATUNDE AYOOLA APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appeal came as a further appeal, from the Federal Court of Appeal, Lagos, arising from a judgment delivered by the Federal Revenue Court, Lagos, in which the former court affirmed the judgment of the lower court but ordered rectification of the Register before the delivery of the new shares certificates to the administrators of the estates of the deceased member.


HELD


The appeal was dismissed


ISSUES


The learned Judges of the Federal Court of Appeal erred in law and did grave injustice to the appellants by deciding the appeal upon grounds not relied upon by the Judge in his judgment and by granting a relief not prayed for either in the court below or in the Court of Appeal particularly when there was no application in the court below or before the Federal Court of Appeal to amend the claim on the Originating Summons.

Whether the Federal Court of Appeal was wrong in making the order it did without insisting on a re-trial of the case in the lower court on an amended claim.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


POWER OF COURT OF APPEAL TO AMEND THE RECORD OF THE TRIAL COURT


“A Court of Appeal has an inherent power to amend the record of the trial court so as to comply with the facts proved before that court and decision given by it.” Per SOWEMIMO, JSC.


JUDGMENTS OF THE COURTS ARE BASED ON ISSUES SO JOINED


“Generally speaking, in cases tried on pleadings where issues joined appear clearly there on, judgments of the courts are based on issues so joined.” Per SOWEMIMO, JSC.


JUDGMENTS OF THE COURTS ARE BASED ON ISSUES SO JOINED


“Generally speaking, in cases tried on pleadings where issues joined appear clearly there on, judgments of the courts are based on issues so joined.” Per SOWEMIMO, JSC.<foo< p=””></foo<>


POWER OF COURT OF APPEAL TO AMEND THE RECORD OF THE TRIAL COURT


“A Court of Appeal has an inherent power to amend the record of the trial court so as to comply with the facts proved before that court and decision given by it.” Per SOWEMIMO, JSC.

<foo< p=””></foo<>


CASES CITED


Divisional Chief Gbogbolulu of Vakpo v. Head Chief Hodo (1941) 7 WACA 164

Clack v. Wood (1881-2) 9 QBD 276


STATUTES REFERRED TO


None.


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.