MARTINS VS NICANNAR FOOD CO. LTD - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

MARTINS VS NICANNAR FOOD CO. LTD

MARTINS VS NICANNAR FOOD CO. LTD
July 18, 2025
UNION BANK OF NIGERIA LTD VS EDIONSERI
July 18, 2025
MARTINS VS NICANNAR FOOD CO. LTD
July 18, 2025
UNION BANK OF NIGERIA LTD VS EDIONSERI
July 18, 2025
Show all

MARTINS VS NICANNAR FOOD CO. LTD

Legalpedia Citation: (1988-03) Legalpedia (SC) 61116

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Mar 25, 1988

Suit Number: SC. 230/1986

CORAM


S.M.A. BELGORE – JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT (Presided and Read the Leading Judgment)

UWAIS,JUSTICE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


MARTINS

APPELLANTS 


NICANNAR FOOD CO. LTD

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


CONTRACT-PURCHASE PRICE-FRAUD-JURISDICTION – STAY OF EXECUTION.

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant sought from the court an order of stay of execution of the judgement of the Federal High Court.

 


HELD


The Court granted a conditional stay of execution of the judgment of the Federal High Court dated 4th March, 1985 pending the determination of the appeal in the Court of Appeal.

 


ISSUES


1. ‘Whether a party who has shown that there is a substantial issue of law to be decided on appeal is entitled to a stay of execution following the decision of this Honourable Court in Balogun v. Balogun (1969) 1 All NLR 349-351.

2. Whether an appellate (sic) court should grant a stay of execution where it is shown that the trial court had no jurisdiction, based on the recent decisions of this Honourable Court in the cases of Akinsanya v. UBA (1986) 4 NWLR 273 (Pt.35) at page 412; Nisaralai Ent. Ltd. v. Arab Bank (1986) 4 NWLR 409 (Pt.36).

3. That the defendant/applicant is entitled to a stay of execution in order not to render his appeal nugatory if he wins on appeal.

4. That justice of this matter demands that the status quo be maintained

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


STAY OF EXECUTION


‘The court’s discretion to grant stay of execution must be exercised judiciously and it would be so exercised where it is shown that the appeal involves substantial points of law necessitating the parties and issues being in status quo until the legal issues are resolved’ – A.NNAMANI, JSC

 


CASES CITED


1. In Abina v. Tika Tore Press (1986) 1 All NLR 210

2. Balogun v. Balogun (1969) 1 All NLR 349-351.

3.   Akinsanya v. UBA (1986) 4 NWLR 273 (Pt.35) at page 412

4. Nisaralai Ent. Ltd. v. Arab Bank (1986) 4 NWLR 409 (Pt.36).

5.  Vaswani v. Savalakh (1972) 12 SC. 77

6.  Annot Lyle (1886) II P. 114 at 116)…

7.  Wey v. Way (1975) 1 SC 1

8.  Olusesan Shogo v. Latitu Musa (1975) 1 NMLR 133

9.  Odufuye v. Fatoke (1977) 4 SC

10.  Dr. TO. Dada v. The University of Lagos and Ors. (1971) 1 UILR 344

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


1.    Supreme Court Act, 19602.    Administration of Justice Act, 1965

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.