K. AKPENE V BARCLAYS BANK OF NIGERIA LTD & ANOR - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

K. AKPENE V BARCLAYS BANK OF NIGERIA LTD & ANOR

ALRAINE (NIG) LIMITED V M.A. ESHIETT
August 6, 2025
J.I. OKOLO V MIDWEST NEWSPAPER CORPORATION & ORS
August 6, 2025
ALRAINE (NIG) LIMITED V M.A. ESHIETT
August 6, 2025
J.I. OKOLO V MIDWEST NEWSPAPER CORPORATION & ORS
August 6, 2025
Show all

K. AKPENE V BARCLAYS BANK OF NIGERIA LTD & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (1977-01) Legalpedia (SC) 81114

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Jan 21, 1977

Suit Number: SC. 308/1974

CORAM


FATAYI-WILLIAMS, CHIEF JUSTICE, NIGERIA

OKAY ACHIKE JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

OBASEKI, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


K. AKPENE

APPELLANTS 


BARCLAYS BANK OF NIGERIA LTD

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


LAND LAW- MORTGAGE-APPEAL-RAISING NEW POINTS ON APPEAL

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant stood surety for his brother who got an overdraft from the respondents. The appellant offered his property as security for the overdraft when the over draft was not paid, the respondent sold the property

 


HELD


The court held that the transaction between the appellant and the 1st respondent was null , void and of no effect because the governors consent was not obtained and consequently the subsequent sale transaction founded on it cannot stand.

 


ISSUES


Whether the 1st defendant/appellant did not comply with the provisions of subsection 1 and 3 of Section 3 of the Native Lands Acquisition Law and as such acquired no interest in the land or house of the plaintiff/appellant.

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


EXCEPTIONS TO WHERE AN APPELLANT WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO RAISE ON APPEAL A QUESTION WHICH WAS NOT RAISED BY THE TRIAL COURT


“An appellant will not be allowed to raise on appeal a question which was not raised or tried or considered by the trial court but where the question involves substantial points of law, substantive or procedural, and it is plain that no further evidence could have been adduced which would affect the decision of them, the court will allow the question to be raised and the points taken and prevent an obvious miscarriage of justice.” Per OBASEKI, JSC.

 


CASES CITED


SHONEKAN V. SMITH (1964) ALL NLR 173

STOOL OF ABINABINA V. CHIEF KOJO ENYINADU (1953) AC 209

MACFOY V. UNITED AFRICA COMPANY LTD (1961)3 WLR 1405 PC

QUO VADIS HOTEL AND RESTAURANT LTD V. COMMISSIONER OF LANDS, MID-WESTERN STATE & ORS (1973) 6 SC 71

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Not Available

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.