JOHN PETER VS THE STATE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

JOHN PETER VS THE STATE

GABRIEL ORUCHE VS COMMISSIONER OF POLICE DELTA STATE
July 4, 2025
LAWANI ADESOKAN & ORS VS PRINCE MICHAEL OYETUNJI OKEYOYIN ADEGOROLU & ORS
July 4, 2025
GABRIEL ORUCHE VS COMMISSIONER OF POLICE DELTA STATE
July 4, 2025
LAWANI ADESOKAN & ORS VS PRINCE MICHAEL OYETUNJI OKEYOYIN ADEGOROLU & ORS
July 4, 2025
Show all

JOHN PETER VS THE STATE

Legalpedia Citation: (1997) Legalpedia (SC) 93161

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Mar 7, 1997

Suit Number: SC.130/1994

CORAM


ABUBAKAR BASHIR WALI JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

MICHAEL EKUNDAYO OGUNDARE JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ANTHONY IKECHUKWU IGUH JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


JOHN PETER APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant was charged and convicted with murder at the Magistrate Court, he appealed his conviction at the Court of Appeal, it was dismissed. Still dissatisfied, he has appealed to this Court.


HELD


I accordingly find no substance in this appeal which is dismissed by me. I affirm the judgment of the court below  ?


ISSUES


Whether the prosecution had proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant murdered Solomon NwokochaWhether the procedure adopted by the trial court and affirmed by the Court of Appeal did not deny the appellant the very essence of a fair hearing guaranteed to him under section 33(4) and (5) of the 1979 Constitution as enunciated by the Supreme Court in Sanusi v. Ameyogun (1992) 4 NWLR (Pt. 237) p. 527


RATIONES DECIDENDI


PROOF OF ALIBI


Therefore while the onus is on the prosecution to prove the charge against an accused person the latter has, however, the duty of bringing the evidence on which he relies for his defence of alibi; when such evidence has been adduced the court should consider it in the light of the evidence adduced by the prosecution in support of the charge against the accused and if in the end the court is unable to reach a decision on the question whether the evidence in support of the case for the prosecution is stronger than that produced in support of the alibi the accused must be acquitted. Per OGUNDARE JSC


PROOF OF ALIBI


The law is that the onus is on the accused person to establish, on the balance of probabilities, the plea of alibi raised by him. Per OGUNDARE JSC.


CASES CITED


Cachi v. The State (1965) NMLR 333Obiode v. The State (1970) 1 All NLR 35Odidika v. The State (1977) 2 SC 21Yanor v. The State (1965) 1 All NLR 193 at 199Chadwick (1917) 12 Cr. App. R. 247.


STATUTES REFERRED TO


NONE  ?


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.