IRENE A. ADEBAJO VS L.A. ADEBAJO - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

IRENE A. ADEBAJO VS L.A. ADEBAJO

SAMUEL OGUEBIE & ANOR V. CHUKWUDILE ODUNWOKE & ORS
August 15, 2025
SCOA MOTORS, ONITSHA & ANOR. VS CHINWUBA ABUMCHUKWU
August 15, 2025
SAMUEL OGUEBIE & ANOR V. CHUKWUDILE ODUNWOKE & ORS
August 15, 2025
SCOA MOTORS, ONITSHA & ANOR. VS CHINWUBA ABUMCHUKWU
August 15, 2025
Show all

IRENE A. ADEBAJO VS L.A. ADEBAJO

Legalpedia Citation: (1973) Legalpedia (SC) 21117

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Wed Apr 18, 1973

Suit Number: SC. 8/1972

CORAM


ELIAS, CHIEF JUSTICE, NIGERIA

EMANUEL OBIOMA OGWUEGBU, JSC. JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT (Read the Leading Judgment)

IRIKEFE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


IRENE A. ADEBAJO APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

This is an appeal against the judgment of the Lagos High Court in which he dismissed the action of the plaintiff concerning the validity of the Will, and pronounced in favor of the will of Israel A. O. Adebajo (deceased) made and executed by the said deceased. The plaintiff issued a writ against the first three defendants. A Statement of Claim was filed, and the Statement of Defense was also filed. And on the plaintiffs application the court granted an order joining the 4th to the 8th defendants. Dissatisfied with the judgment of the high court, the plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court.


HELD


The appeal was dismissed.


ISSUES


Judgment is against the weight of evidence.

The learned Chief Justice in accepting the evidence of Mr. Osijo failed to direct his mind properly to the evidential value of the endorsement on the Will as to the date when it was made.

The learned Chief Justice erred on the facts in failing to accept the evidence of the first plaintiff in regard to the way in which the deceased carried on his work at home between March or April, 1969 till June, 1969 when the attempts made by the defendants to discredit her testimony were wholly unsuccessful.

The learned Chief Justice erred in law in making either a pronouncement in favor of the Will when there was no counter-claim before him to that effect.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


THE STATE OF HEALTH AND MENTAL CAPACITY OF THE DECEASED MATTER WHEN MAKING A WILL


“What really mattered, however, was the state of health and mental capacity of the deceased when he made the Will.” Per ELIAS, CJN.


CASES CITED


Powell v. Steathem Manor Nursing Home (1935) AC 243, at p. 255

Walter Loeb v. Solomon Nasser (1937) 3 WACA 227, at p. 228

Kojo II v. Bonsie and Anor. (1953) 14 WACA 242, at p. 243


STATUTES REFERRED TO


None


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.