IBIYEMI ODUYE V NIGERIA AIRWAYS LIMITED - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

IBIYEMI ODUYE V NIGERIA AIRWAYS LIMITED

M. A. OMISADE & 3 ORS VS HARRY AKANDE
July 21, 2025
MOSHESHE GENERAL MERCHANT LTD VS NIGERIA STEEL PRODUCTIONS LTD
July 21, 2025
M. A. OMISADE & 3 ORS VS HARRY AKANDE
July 21, 2025
MOSHESHE GENERAL MERCHANT LTD VS NIGERIA STEEL PRODUCTIONS LTD
July 21, 2025
Show all

IBIYEMI ODUYE V NIGERIA AIRWAYS LIMITED

Legalpedia Citation: (1987) Legalpedia (SC) 16142

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Apr 10, 1987

Suit Number: SC.135/1985

CORAM


MOHAMMED BELLO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

KAYODE ESO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ANTHONY NNAEMEZIE ANIAGOLU, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

DAHUNSI OLUGBEMI COKER, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

SAIDU KAWU, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

CHUKWUDIFU AKUNNE OPUTA, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


MRS. IBIYEMI ODUYE

APPELLANTS 


NIGERIA AIRWAYS LIMITED

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


TENANCY LAW

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Appellant sued the Respondent for damages for breach of contract of Service, the Respondent counter-claimed for mesne profits, at the rate of Nl3,500.00 per annum in respect of the apartment let to the appellant as a staff of the respondents company. The High Court found for the Respondent so also did the Appeal Court, hence this present appeal.

 


HELD


Allowing the appeal.

 


ISSUES


(1) Whether or not the relationship of landlord and tenant existing between the Appellant and the Respondent continued after the cessation of the Appellants employment having regard to Ex. “A”.

(2). Whether or not the Lagos High Court had jurisdiction to award the sum of N13,500.00 per annum as mesne profits or that the sum of N13,500.00 represented an increase in rent which only the Rent Tribunal had jurisdiction to order.

(3) Whether jurisdiction was vested in the High Court as a result of the Respondents Claim being a counter-claim.

(4) Whether the Court of Appeal could properly have awarded the sum of N13,500 upon a basis different from that which was pleaded by the Respondent.

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


STATUTORY TENANT


The statutory tenant is an occupier who, when his contractual tenancy expires, holds over and continues in possession by ” virtue of special statutory provisions. He has also been described as “that anomalous legal entity,who hold the land of another contrary to the will of that other person who strongly desires to turn him out. Such a person will not ordinarily be described as a tenant” Per Eso JSC

 


STATUS OF A PERSON OCCUPIES PREMISES LAWFULLY


When a person occupies premises lawfully he becomes a protected tenant qua a status arising from Statute creating statutory tenancy. It would not matter whether he pays regular rent, subsidized rent, or, indeed, no rent. Per Eso JSC

 


STATUTORY TENANT


The expression “statutory tenancy” has also been defined as “a compendious expression to describe the right of a tenant of protected premises to remain in possession of those premises, notwithstanding the determination of his contractual interest until such time as either he voluntarily gives up possession, or the court, on cause shown, makes an order against him to deliver up possession. Per Eso JSC

 


CASES CITED


Akpiri v. W.AAC.; XIV W.A.C.A. 195

Sobamowo v. Federal Republic Trustee (1970) 1 All N.L.R. 257

Akinosho v. Enigbokan 22 N.L.R. 88

Sule v. Nigerian Cotton Board (1985) 2 N.W.L.R. 17

Pan Asian African Co. Ltd. v. National Insurance Corporation (Nigeria) Ltd. (1982) 9 SC. 1

Lewis v. M. T. C. (Cars) Ltd. 1974 2 All E.R. 423

Shutter vs. Hersh (1921) 1 K.B. 438 at 448

American Economic Laundry Ltd. v. Little (1951) 1 K.B. 400 at 4061

Keaves v. Dean; Nunn v. Pellegrini (1924) 1 K.B. 685 at 686

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Akpiri v. W.AAC.; XIV W.A.C.A. 195

Sobamowo v. Federal Republic Trustee (1970) 1 All N.L.R. 257

Akinosho v. Enigbokan 22 N.L.R. 88

Sule v. Nigerian Cotton Board (1985) 2 N.W.L.R. 17

Pan Asian African Co. Ltd. v. National Insurance Corporation (Nigeria) Ltd. (1982) 9 SC. 1

Lewis v. M. T. C. (Cars) Ltd. 1974 2 All E.R. 423

Shutter vs. Hersh (1921) 1 K.B. 438 at 448

American Economic Laundry Ltd. v. Little (1951) 1 K.B. 400 at 4061

Keaves v. Dean; Nunn v. Pellegrini (1924) 1 K.B. 685 at 686

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.