HAND OF GOD ESTATE LIMITED VS MR. BASHAR DANKARO - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

HAND OF GOD ESTATE LIMITED VS MR. BASHAR DANKARO

SUBSEA SERVICES INTERNATIONAL INC. VS ACCESS BANK
March 27, 2025
CHIEF OBONG GORDON ETUKEREN v CHIEF OKON SUNDAY PETER UKO & ORS
March 27, 2025
SUBSEA SERVICES INTERNATIONAL INC. VS ACCESS BANK
March 27, 2025
CHIEF OBONG GORDON ETUKEREN v CHIEF OKON SUNDAY PETER UKO & ORS
March 27, 2025
Show all

HAND OF GOD ESTATE LIMITED VS MR. BASHAR DANKARO

Legalpedia Citation: (2022-04) Legalpedia 74712 (CA)

In the Court of Appeal

Holden at Lagos

Tue Mar 22, 2022

Suit Number: CA/LAG/CV/1204/2019

CORAM


OBANDE FESTUS OGBUINYA, JUSTICE COURT OF APPEAL

MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM SIRAJO, JUSTICE COURT OF APPEAL

PETER O. AFFEN, JUSTICE COURT OF APPEAL


PARTIES


HAND OF GOD ESTATE LIMITED & ORS

APPELLANTS 


MR. BASHAR DANKARO & ORS

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


ACTION, APPEAL, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, COURT, DAMAGES, FAIR HEARING, INTERPRETATION OF STATUTE, JUDGMENT AND ORDER, LEGAL PERSONALITY, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE, WORDS AND PHRASES

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Respondents instituted this action before the High Court of Lagos State, Lagos Division in respect of a parcel of land, lying at Block 76, Plot 39, Lekki Phase 1, Lekki, Lagos. wherein vide their Amended Writ of Summons, they sought against the Appellants and one Mr. Oluwole Fowora (1st Defendant at the trial Court), declaratives and injunctive reliefs, Damages and cost of litigation. In reaction, the Appellants filed a joint Statement of Defence and also Counter-claimed against the Respondents. At the end of the trial, the Court non-suited the Respondents and granted partially prayer (1) of the counter-claim and dismissed the other reliefs therein. Dissatisfied with the judgment of the trial Court, the Appellant appealed against same vide his Notice of Appeal containing 4 Grounds of Appeal. The Respondents alongside their brief of argument filed a Preliminary Objection challenging the competence of the appeal.

 


HELD


Appeal Allowed

 


ISSUES


Whether upon the findings of the lower court that the Claimants/Respondents had failed to satisfy the burden of proof in the suit, the lower court ought to have dismissed the Claimants’/Respondents’ claims as against making an order to non-suit against the claim.

Whether the Appellants had established cogent proof before the Lower Court to entitle them to the grant of all the reliefs in their counterclaim.

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


THE NATURE AND PURPORT OF A PRELIMINARY OBJECTION


“A preliminary objection is a specie of objection which, if sustained by a court, will render further proceedings in a matter unnecessary, see Abe v. UniIlorin(2013) 16 NWLR (Pt. 1379) 183; APC v. INEC (2015) 8 NWLR (Pt. 1462) 531; Jim-Jaja v. C.P, Rivers State (2013) 6 NWLR (Pt. 1350) 225. For this reason, the law commands the court to deal first with a preliminary objection when raised in any proceedings, see Uwazurike v. A.-G., Fed. (2007) 8 NWLR (Pt. 1035)1; B.A.S.F. (Nig.) Ltd v. Faith Enterprises Ltd. (2010) 4 NWLR (Pt. 1183) 104; SPDCN Ltd v4’madi (2011)14 NWLR (Pt. 1266) 157; FBN Plc v. T.S.A. md. Ltd (2010) 15 NWLR (Pt. 1216) 247; Okereke v. James (2012) 16 NWLR (Pt. 1326) 339; APC v. INEC (Supra); Ogboru v. Uduaghan(2013) 1 NWLR (Pt. 1311) 357; Efet v. INEC (2011) 7 NWLR (Pt. 1247) 423; Sa’eedv. Yakowa(2013) 7 NWLR (Pt. 1352) 133; Daniel v. INEC (2015) 9 NWLR (Pt. 1463) 113; SPDCN Ltd. v. Agbara(2016) 2 NWLR (Pt. 1496) 353; Agbaje v. INEC (2016) 4 NWLR (Pt. 1501) 151; Allanah v. Kpolokwu(2016) 6 NWLR (Pt. 1057) 1; Umanah (Jnr.) v. NDIC  (2016) 14 NWLR (Pt. 1533) 458; Esuwoye v. Bosere(2017) 1 NWLR (Pt. 1546) 256; Achonu v. Okuwobi(2017) 14 NWLR (Pt. 1584) 142. -PER O. F. OGBUINYA, J.C.A

 


STATUS OF THE LEGAL CAPACITY OF A DECEASED PERSON TO SUE OR BE SUED


“The settled position of the law, in the days of the yore, is that a dead person loses his legal personality and as such cannot sue or be sued in any action. By the same token, such a deceased person cannot initiate or defend an appeal. In the Latin days of the law, the hallowed principle of law was encapsulated in the maxim: Actio persona lismoritor cum persona: a personal action dies with the person, see Management Enterprises Ltd. v. Otusanya (1987) 1 NSCC (vol. 18) 577/(1987) 2 NWLR (Pt. 55) 179/(1987) 4 SC 368; Oyeyemi v. Commissioner for L.G. Kwara State (1992) 2 NWLR (Pt. 226) 661; In Re: Adeosun (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt. 714) 200; Ezenwosu v. Ngonadi(1988) 3 NWLR (Pt. 81) 163; In Re: Otuedon (1995) 4 NWLR (Pt. 392) 655; C.C.B. (Nig.) Ltd. v. Onwuchekwa (2000) 3 NWLR (Pt. 647) 65; Mulima v. Usman(2014) 16 NWLR (Pt. 1432) 160; APC v. INEC (2015) 8 NWLR (Pt. 1462) 531.Bajehsonv.Otiko(2018) 14 NWLR (Pt. 1638) 138; Adeniran v. Olusokun II (2019) 8 NWLR (Pt. 1673) 98. -PER O. F. OGBUINYA, J.C.A

 


CASES CITED


None

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 as amended

High Court of Lagos State (Civil Procedure) Rules, 2019 and 2012

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.