GLOBAL EXCELLENCE COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED & 3 ORS V MR. DONALD DUKE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

GLOBAL EXCELLENCE COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED & 3 ORS V MR. DONALD DUKE

MRS. MATILDA ADERONKE DAIRO V UNION BANK OF NIGERIA PLC & ANOR
June 2, 2025
CHEVRON NIGERIA LIMITED V LONESTAR DRILLING NIGERIA LIMITED
June 2, 2025
MRS. MATILDA ADERONKE DAIRO V UNION BANK OF NIGERIA PLC & ANOR
June 2, 2025
CHEVRON NIGERIA LIMITED V LONESTAR DRILLING NIGERIA LIMITED
June 2, 2025
Show all

GLOBAL EXCELLENCE COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED & 3 ORS V MR. DONALD DUKE

Legalpedia Citation: (2007) Legalpedia (SC) 19071

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Jul 13, 2007

Suit Number: SC. 313/2006

CORAM


TOBI

TOBI

P.N. NWOKEDI – JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

TOBI

TOBI

TOBI

TOBI

TOBI

TOBI

TOBI

TOBI

TOBI

TOBI

TOBI

TOBI

TOBI

TOBI

TOBI

TOBI

TOBI

TOBI

TOBI

TOBI

TOBI

TOBI

TOBI

P.N. NWOKEDI – JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

TOBI


PARTIES


GLOBAL EXCELLENCE COMMUNICATIONS LIMITEDMAYOR AKINPELU EJIRO RENE ADIGBOOGECHI UDI APPELLANTS


MR DONALD DUKE

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Respondent sued the Appellants for libel following the publication in the Global Excellence Magazine under the caption GOV. DONALD DUKE IN MESSY CERTIFICATE SCANDAL. The Appellants raised a preliminary objection on the competence of the action and the jurisdiction of the court to entertain it.


HELD


The Apex Court held that the immunity conferred on  public office holders under section 308 of the constitution does not bar them from instituting proceedings in courts of law while in office.


ISSUES


Whether the respondent, having regards to the absolute immunity conferred on him by the said section 308(1) of the 1999 Constitution has the right or liberty to institute or continue any civil action against any person(s) during his tenure of office as Governor of Cross River State.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


SCOPE OF IMMUNITY OF AVAILABLE TO A GOVERNOR OF A STATE


“The above provisions are as clear as crystal on the immunity available to the Governor of a state in civil and criminal suit that may be instituted against him. They did not state that the Governor (the respondent in this case) cannot sue; the provision of subsection (a) supra merely states that he cannot be sued. It will be definitely wrong to read between the lines and in the process smuggle matters which were not intended by the legislator into the provisions of section 308 of the Constitution supra.” Per A. M. MUKHTAR, JSC


CASES CITED


1. Chief Onabanjo v. Concord Press of Nigeria Ltd. (1981) 2 NCLR 3992. Tinubu v. I.M.B. Securities Plc (2001) 8 NWLR (Pt 740) 192 at 708 and 718


STATUTES REFERRED TO


1. The 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.