FEDERAL CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION & 2 ORS VS J. O. LAOYE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

FEDERAL CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION & 2 ORS VS J. O. LAOYE

ELIJAH OLADEJI KOSILE VS AMUBA OLANIYI FOLARIN
July 17, 2025
NARUMAL & SONS NIGERIA LTD VS NIGER BENUE TRANSPORT COMPANY LTD
July 17, 2025
ELIJAH OLADEJI KOSILE VS AMUBA OLANIYI FOLARIN
July 17, 2025
NARUMAL & SONS NIGERIA LTD VS NIGER BENUE TRANSPORT COMPANY LTD
July 17, 2025
Show all

FEDERAL CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION & 2 ORS VS J. O. LAOYE

Legalpedia Citation: (1989-04) Legalpedia 85463 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden At Lagos

Fri Apr 21, 1989

Suit Number: S.C. 202/1987

CORAM


NNAMANI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

KAWU, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

KARIBI-WHYTE, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

AGBAJE, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

OPUTA, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

ESO, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

NNAEMEKA-AGU, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


FEDERAL CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION & 2 ORS

APPELLANTS 


J. O. LAOYE

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


EMPLOYMENT LAW / PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The respondent was dismissed from service on the report of criminal misconduct given by the Ministry of External Affairs to the Civil Service Commission who did not investigate the Respondent.

 


HELD


The court held that the dismissal was a nullity.

 


ISSUES


1. Whether the decision in Garba and Ors v. The University of Maiduguri (1986)1 N.W.L.R. Part 18 page 550 applies in this case even though there was an allegation of misconduct which would appear to be crime in issue;

2. Whether the dismissal of the Respondent, having regard to all the surrounding circumstances, was in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Civil Service Rules.

3. Whether the dismissal of the Respondent, having regard to all the surrounding circumstances, is in accordance with the rules of natural justice;

4. Whether the Public Service Commission was obliged to comply strictly and literally with the provisions of section 33(1) of the Constitution 1979.

5. Whether the Supremacy of the constitutional provisions as overriding the Rules was given its due recognition and effect;

6. Whether section 33(4) of the Constitution of 1979 is applicable to this case.

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


MISCONDUCT BOTHERING ON CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS: DUTY OF EMPLOYER.


An employee must be given a hearing before he is disciplined and if the allegation is one that touches the commission of a crime, it is only a Criminal Tribunal that could convict him – Eso J.S.C.

 


CASES CITED


1. Dr. 0. G. Sofekun V. Chief N. 0. A. Akin yemi & 3 Ors. (1980) 5-7

2. Shitta-Bey v. Federal Civil Service Commission (1981)1 S.C. 40

3. Prof Olaniyan & ors. v. University of Lagos & ors. (1985)2 N.W.L.R. (Part 9)599

4. Garba v. University of Maiduguri (1986)1 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 18) 550

5. Adigun & Ors. v. Attorney-General of Oyo State (1987)1 N.W.L.R. (Pt.53) 678

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


The 1979 Constitution

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.