EZEALA NNAJI OFOR VS. LINUS UKONU - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

EZEALA NNAJI OFOR VS. LINUS UKONU

VICTOR IYERE & ORS VS SIMEON DURU & ANOR
July 21, 2025
TRANS BRIDGE COMPANY LIMITED VS. SURVEY INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
July 21, 2025
VICTOR IYERE & ORS VS SIMEON DURU & ANOR
July 21, 2025
TRANS BRIDGE COMPANY LIMITED VS. SURVEY INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
July 21, 2025
Show all

EZEALA NNAJI OFOR VS. LINUS UKONU

Legalpedia Citation: (1986-07) Legalpedia 22966 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden At Lagos

Sat Jul 12, 1986

Suit Number: SC 179/1984

CORAM


IRIKEFE, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

BELLO,JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

ESO, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

ANIAGOLU, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

UWAIS, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

KAZEEM, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

OPUTA, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


EZEALA NNAJIOFOR

NWANERI NWOSU

NWAOPARA OGBOGU

ANOSIKE OSUAGWU

MADUWUBA MGBUDOM

AJOMIURE IYIOKU (For themselves and as representing Ezemelaha Village in Eziama)

APPELLANTS 


LINUS UKONU

SAMUEL IBE

EDMUND UBAKA (For themselves and as representing Ndimbara Village in Eziama)

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


LAND LAW – INJUNCTION – TRESPASS – DAMAGES

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The plaintifs filed an action for declaration of title to a piece of land, that is the land in dispute, known as “Okohia Ndimbara” which is situate at Ndimbara Village of Eziama in Orlu Judicial Division against the defendants.

 

 


HELD


The Court dismissed the appeal.

 


ISSUES


Whether the trial (in the High Court) had taken such an inordinately long time that the appellants could be said to have been denied a fair hearing within a reasonable time, and the denial had been such as to occasion a miscarriage of justice

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


MEANING OF ‘REASONABLE TIME’


“In my opinion, therefore, “reasonable time” in the context of section 33 subsection (1) of the 1979 Constitution can only be determined in the light of the circumstances and peculiarities of each case. It is not therefore possible to lay down a fixed rule as to what “reasonable time” is in the trial of every case. Some cases are by their nature short or lengthy by reason of the number of witnesses to be called or the length of the testimonies of the witnesses.” UWAIS JSC.

 


CASES CITED


1. Ariori and ors. v. Elemo and others)1983) 1S.C.13 at pp. 27-28; 71 and 75

2. Awobiyi and Sons v. Igbalaiye Bros., [1965] 1 All N.L.R. 163 at p.166;

3. Lawal v. Dawodu, [1972] 1 All N.L.R. (Part 2) 270 at p. 279 to 280

4. Akpor v. Iguoriguo, [1978] 1 L.R.N. 36 at p. 40; (1978) 2 S.C. 115.

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Not Available

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.