DR. A.A. NWAFOR ORIZU V. FRANCIS E.A. ANAYAEGBUNAM - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

DR. A.A. NWAFOR ORIZU V. FRANCIS E.A. ANAYAEGBUNAM

PHARMACISTS BOARD OF NIGERIA & ORS V. S.O. ADEBESIN & CO. LTD
August 4, 2025
P.O. EWARAMI V. AFRICAN CONTINENTAL BANK LTD
August 4, 2025
PHARMACISTS BOARD OF NIGERIA & ORS V. S.O. ADEBESIN & CO. LTD
August 4, 2025
P.O. EWARAMI V. AFRICAN CONTINENTAL BANK LTD
August 4, 2025
Show all

DR. A.A. NWAFOR ORIZU V. FRANCIS E.A. ANAYAEGBUNAM

Legalpedia Citation: (1978-05) Legalpedia (SC) 09041

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Mon May 8, 1978

Suit Number: SC. 109/1976

CORAM


SOWEMIMO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

IDIGBE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ESO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


DR. A.A. NWAFOR ORIZU

APPELLANTS 


FRANCIS E.A. ANYAGBUNAM

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


PROPERTY LAW / EVIDENCE

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The plaintiff (respondent) claimed from the defendant (appellant) a declaration of title to the piece of land, £500 damages for trespass to the said land by the Defendant, his servants and agents, and their destruction of economic trees and crops on the said land and perpetual injunction to restrain the defendant from further trespassing or committing acts of waste or wanton destruction of the said land.

 


HELD


The Supreme Court held that once an instrument has been duly registered under the relevant provisions of the Land Instruments Registration Law its admissibility is not open to question in proceedings in which the Registrar of Deeds is not a party. The principle omnia praesumuntur legitme facta donoc probetur in contrarium applies.

 


ISSUES


Not Available

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


ADMISSIBILITY OF FACTS AFTER PROCESSION OF PROCEEDING


“It is my view that if a fact did not exist when proceedings are pending or anticipated and such a fact was brought into existence even before litigation was in contemplation the court would hold the view that it was manufactured to harness the case and would exclude it. But if a fact existed before proceedings were pending or anticipated it is not ante litem motem if that existing fact is made admissible evidence by stamping or registration or in any other way treated (sic) to render it in compulsory registration. This is fulfilling the law rather than circumventing it.” Per IDIGBE, JSC

 


CASES CITED


African Continental Bank v. Attorney-General of Northern Nigeria, (1967) NMLR 231

Oduka & Ors. v. Kasunmu & Ors. (1968) NMLR 28

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


The Evidence Act

The Land Instrument Registration Law

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.