COMMISSIONER FOR WORKS, BENUE STATE VS DEVCON DEY. CONSULTANTS LTD - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

COMMISSIONER FOR WORKS, BENUE STATE VS DEVCON DEY. CONSULTANTS LTD

THEOPHILUS ONUOHA VS THE STATE
July 17, 2025
MILITARY GOVERNOR OF ONDO STATE VS VICTOR ADEGOKE ADEWUNMI
July 17, 2025
THEOPHILUS ONUOHA VS THE STATE
July 17, 2025
MILITARY GOVERNOR OF ONDO STATE VS VICTOR ADEGOKE ADEWUNMI
July 17, 2025
Show all

COMMISSIONER FOR WORKS, BENUE STATE VS DEVCON DEY. CONSULTANTS LTD

Legalpedia Citation: (1988-07) Legalpedia 62332 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden At Lagos

Fri Jul 1, 1988

Suit Number: SC. 209/1986

CORAM


E.O. OGWUEGBU -JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT(Read the leading judgement)

ASEME, JUSTICE COURT OF APPEAL

SYLVESTER UMARU ONU JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT (Read the Leading Judgment)

OBASEKI JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT COMMISSIONER FOR WORKS, BENUE STATE

UWAIS JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY -GENERAL, BENUE STATE APPELLANT

OBASEKI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

UWAIS, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

KARIBI-WHYTE, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

BELGORE, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

CRAIG, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


COMMISSIONER FOR WORKS, BENUE STATE

APPELLANTS 


DEVCON DEY. CONSULTANTS LTD

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


Not Available

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The plaintiffs jointly and severally claim against the defendants jointly and severally for a declaration that letter Number 0/7/Vol.II/526 dated the 17th day of October, 1985, from the Military Governor of Benue State, which purported to terminate the written agreement dated 16th day of May, 1985 between the plaintiffs and the Government of Benue State for the plaintiffs to provide the said Government with certain engineering services, that is to say, the management and supervision of Foreign Loan Contracts in Benue State is contrary to the terms of the said agreement and in breach thereof and consequently null, void and of no effect whatsoever.

 


HELD


APPEAL ALLOWED

 


ISSUES


Not Available

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT THAT TO BE PERFORM IN FUTURE


Where there a contract to be performed in the future, if one of the party has said to other in effect ‘if you go on and perform your side of the contract I will not perform min,” that in effect, amounts to saying I will perform the contract. In that case the other party may say, ‘you have given me distinct notice that you will not perform the contract. I will not wait until you have broken it, but I will treat you as having put an end to the contract, and if necessary I will sue for damages, but at all event I will not go on with the contract.” LORD BLACKBURN, KARIBI WHYTE J.S.C

 


CASES CITED


Mersey Stell and Iron Co. v. Naylor Benzon & Co at pp.442-443

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Not Avalable

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.