CHIEF MAXWELL DAKIPIRI ODI & ORS V CHIEF HARRISON IYALLA - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

CHIEF MAXWELL DAKIPIRI ODI & ORS V CHIEF HARRISON IYALLA

CHIEKWE IKWUNZE ESIAGA V UNIVERSITY OF CALABAR
June 12, 2025
HON. EMIBRA EFIRIANDI AGBEOTU v. MR. TAMARATE BRISIBE & ORS.
June 12, 2025
CHIEKWE IKWUNZE ESIAGA V UNIVERSITY OF CALABAR
June 12, 2025
HON. EMIBRA EFIRIANDI AGBEOTU v. MR. TAMARATE BRISIBE & ORS.
June 12, 2025
Show all

CHIEF MAXWELL DAKIPIRI ODI & ORS V CHIEF HARRISON IYALLA

Legalpedia Citation: (2004) Legalpedia (SC) 16547

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Apr 2, 2004

Suit Number: SC.67/1999

CORAM


SALIHU MODIBBO ALFA BELGORE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

UWANI MUSA ABBA AJI

IGNATIUS CHUKWUDI PATS-ACHOLONU, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


1. CHIEF MAXWELL DAKIPIRI ODI2. FINNY KARIBO3. KALABO AMAH4. IBRAHIM FUBARA5. WRIGHT INK-ORIKA6. AUGUSTINE KALAMBERE APPELLANTS


1ST/2ND SETS OF RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellants claimed title to the land in dispute but gave contradictory evidence including that the land belongs to a 3rd party. They also sought to raise estoppels in a supplementary brief.


HELD


The court held that their case was entitled to be dismissed and not non- suited


ISSUES


(i)  Was the Court of Appeal right in dismissing Plaintiffs’ appeal against the judgment of the High Court which relied on evidence of 3rd party interest in the land in dispute elicited from a witness in cross examination when the Court of Appeal itself found that third party interest was not raised in the pleadings?(ii) Was the Court of Appeal right in law in relying on evidence of third party interest when the issue was not raised in the pleadings of the parties in coming to its decision in the appeal?


RATIONES DECIDENDI


CASES CITED


1. Egbe V. Adefarasin (1987) I NWLR (Pt. 47) 1;2. Sosan V. Ademuyiwa (1986) 3 NWLR (Pt. 27) 241;3. Oshodi V. Eyifunmi (2000) 13 NWLR (Pt. 684) 2984. Ojiegbe V. Okwaranyia (1962) All NLR 605


STATUTES REFERRED TO


The Evidence Act


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.