CHIEF JUSTUS UDUEDO AKPOR V. ODHOGU IGUORIGUO & ORS - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

CHIEF JUSTUS UDUEDO AKPOR V. ODHOGU IGUORIGUO & ORS

AFRICAN CONTINENTAL BANK LTD V. FESTUS SUMIOLA YESUFU
August 4, 2025
CHUKUKA OSSAI NWABUOKEI VS FRANCIS IWENJIWE & ORS
August 4, 2025
AFRICAN CONTINENTAL BANK LTD V. FESTUS SUMIOLA YESUFU
August 4, 2025
CHUKUKA OSSAI NWABUOKEI VS FRANCIS IWENJIWE & ORS
August 4, 2025
Show all

CHIEF JUSTUS UDUEDO AKPOR V. ODHOGU IGUORIGUO & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1978-02) Legalpedia (SC) 81311

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Feb 10, 1978

Suit Number: SC. 122/1976

CORAM


SOWEMIMO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

IDIGBE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ESO JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


CHIEF JUSTUS UDUEDO AKPOR (For himself and on behalf of Odhe branch of the Emeni family of Irri town in isoko Division)

APPELLANTS 


ODHOGO IGUORIGUO

ILAYA IGUORIGUO

OKPOMERIE IGUORIGUO

ODARIEDUO IGUORIGUO

OLOGU OGBERIBHR (For themselves and on behalf of the Ateme family of Irri Town in Isoko Division.)

6. IYERI UDHERIOKE (F)

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


COURT – JUDGMENT

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The trial court gave judgment against the appellant on the basis of evidence which were given more than 2 years before. There had had been series of adjournment coupled with the fact the judge was transferred to other division before returning to conclude the case.

 


HELD


The court allowed the appeal.

 


ISSUES


Whether the learned trial judge in the peculiar circumstances of these proceedings ought to be regarded as having lost his impressions of the witnesses who testified before him long before he delivered his judgment

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


DUTY ON APPELLATE COURT TO SET ASIDE FINDINGS OF A TRIAL JUDGE BASED UPON ILL-FOUNDED IMPRESSION OF A WITNESS BY REASON OF LAPSE OF TIME


In non-jury cases coming on appeal, the Judges findings, made after hearing the witnesses and observing their demeanour, are entitled to great weight and should not be disturbed unless it is clear that they are unsound. An appellate tribunal, however, can in appropriate cases interfere with such findings (based on facts given in evidence by witness) if from the record it is convinced that such findings are based upon ill-founded impression of a witness or that the learned Judge in the trial court has not taken proper advantage of his having seen, heard and observed the demeanour of a witness- Idigbe J.S.C

 


CASES CITED


Awobiyi & Sons v. Igbalaiye Brothers (1965) 1 All NLR 163

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Not Available

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.