CHIEF AMODU TIJANI DADA & 2 ORS V. MR. JACOB BANKOLE & 2 ORS - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

CHIEF AMODU TIJANI DADA & 2 ORS V. MR. JACOB BANKOLE & 2 ORS

MADAM ABUSATU AGBOGUNLERI VS JOHN DEPO & ORS
May 30, 2025
CHIEF EDMUND I. AKANINWO & ORS V CHIEF O. N. NSIRIM & ORS
May 30, 2025
MADAM ABUSATU AGBOGUNLERI VS JOHN DEPO & ORS
May 30, 2025
CHIEF EDMUND I. AKANINWO & ORS V CHIEF O. N. NSIRIM & ORS
May 30, 2025
Show all

CHIEF AMODU TIJANI DADA & 2 ORS V. MR. JACOB BANKOLE & 2 ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (2008) Legalpedia (SC) 10311

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Jan 18, 2008

Suit Number: SC.40/2003

CORAM


GEORGE ADESOLA OGUNTADE(Lead Judgment) JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


1. CHIEF AMODU TIJANI DADAMUBEEN ADEYEMI TALABIMR. MOROOF AKANBI OBI (For themselves and on behalf of Ikotun Matori Families of Iyesi Otta, Ogun State) APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Appellants brought this suit due to the failure of the Respondents to pay the due tributes to the Appellants’ families after falling trees, possession and perpetual injunction. The trial court found for the Appellants. Respondents’ appeal to the court of appeal was successful, hence this present appeal.


HELD


Appeal dismissed. The court held that the trial court did not properly evaluate the case of the parties at the trial as found by the court of Appeal.


ISSUES


1.   Whether the second issue formulated by the appellants (now Respondents) at the Lower court did not dovetail into a complaint against evaluation of evidence by the trial court thus empowering the learned Justices of the Court of Appeal to proceed to re-evaluate the evidence of both parties and make appropriate findings after their Lordships had discerned from the record of appeal that the trial judge had failed to avail himself of the opportunity to conduct a proper evaluation of the facts presented by parties at trial.2.   Whether the learned Justices of the Court of Appeal were not right in holding that the learned trial judge had made a wrong use of evidence in previous proceedings in a gross manner which engendered a miscarriage of justice and thus vitiated the judgment of the learned trial judge


RATIONES DECIDENDI


CASES CITED


1. Alade v. Aborishade [1960] SCNLR 398;2. Shonekan v. Smith [1964] 1 All N.L.R. 333. Obawole & Anor. v. Coker [1994] 5 NWLR 416,


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Evidence Act


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.