CHIEF ADERIBIGBE JEOBA V. OSHO OWONIFARI - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

CHIEF ADERIBIGBE JEOBA V. OSHO OWONIFARI

RABIATU LATUNWOUN ADELOWO & ORS V. AKINGBALA & ANOR
August 11, 2025
J. D. OWUMI VS PATERSON ZOCHONIS & CO (NIG.) LTD.
August 11, 2025
RABIATU LATUNWOUN ADELOWO & ORS V. AKINGBALA & ANOR
August 11, 2025
J. D. OWUMI VS PATERSON ZOCHONIS & CO (NIG.) LTD.
August 11, 2025
Show all

CHIEF ADERIBIGBE JEOBA V. OSHO OWONIFARI

Legalpedia Citation: (1974-10) Legalpedia (SC) 17190

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Oct 25, 1974

Suit Number: SC. 370/1973

CORAM


EMANUEL OBIOMA OGWUEGBU, JSC. JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT (Read the Leading Judgment)

OLUFUNLOLA OYELOLA ADEKEYE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

GEORGE B. A. COKER, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


CHIEF ADERIBIGBE JEOBA

APPELLANTS 


OSHO OWONIFARI

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – PARTIES-JURISTIC PERSONALITY

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The respondent was substituted for his late father who was sued in his chieftaincy title name, the Oniran of Orin. The appellants case was dismissed on the ground that the Oniran of Orin was not a legal person for whom the respondent can validly be substituted for.

 


HELD


The court held that the Oniran of Orin was validly sued in a representative capacity and that the lower courts were wrong to have dismissed the appellants case.

 


ISSUES


1. Whether the action brought by the appellant was brought against a non-existent person.

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


AMENDMENT TO CORRECT THE NAME OF A PARTY


An amendment to correct the name of a party may be allowed, notwithstanding that it is alleged that the effect of the amendment will be to substitute a new party, if the court is satisfied that the mistake sought to be corrected was a genuine mistake and was not misleading. Per Fatai- Williams J.S.C

 


MULTIPLE CAPACITY OF A NATURAL PERSON


A natural person can have double or even multiple capacity. An example of this is a person who, as in the case in hand, is also a traditional chief. Such a person will have both his own personal name and his chieftaincy title. It is not unusual here in Nigeria, out of respect for tradition, to refer to such a person, on all occasions, only by his chieftaincy title. Per Fatai- Williams J.S.C

 


CASES CITED


1. Olu of Warri v. Chief Sam Warri Esi (1958) 3 FSC 94,

2. Establissment Baudelot v. R.S. Graham & Co. Ltd. (1953) 1 All ER 149,

3. Alexander Mountain & Co. v. Rumers Ltd. (1948) 2 All ER 483

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


1. Rules of the Supreme Court in England

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.