ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE MID-WESTERN STATE VS CHIEF SAM ESI - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE MID-WESTERN STATE VS CHIEF SAM ESI

A.G. OF THE MID-WESTERN STATE V CHIEF SAM WARRI ESI
August 6, 2025
D.M. AIGBE VS BISHOP JOHN EDOKPOLOR
August 6, 2025
A.G. OF THE MID-WESTERN STATE V CHIEF SAM WARRI ESI
August 6, 2025
D.M. AIGBE VS BISHOP JOHN EDOKPOLOR
August 6, 2025
Show all

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE MID-WESTERN STATE VS CHIEF SAM ESI

Legalpedia Citation: (1977-04) Legalpedia 28850 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

HOLDEN AT LAGOS

Thu Apr 14, 1977

Suit Number: SC. 336/1975

CORAM



PARTIES


THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE MID-WESTERN STATE

APPELLANTS 


CHIEF SAM WARRI ESI

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


TRANSFER AND VESTING OF PROPERTY

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

This appeal was brought from the judgment of the high court, in favour of the plaintiff by which it was ordered that the purported transfer and vesting of Esi College, Warri to the Government of Mid-Western State of Nigeria by virtue of the Education Edict 1972 was invalid. And it was ordered that the Government of the Mid-Western State of Nigeria or anyone acting by authority or order of the said Government be restrained from interfering with the plaintiff’s rights and interests in accordance with the powers conferred by Section 39(1) of the Education Edict. Not satisfied with this decision, the defendant appealed to the Supreme Court.

 


HELD


The appeal failed. The judgment of the High Court was affirmed.

 


ISSUES


1. The learned trial Judge erred in law in that part of his judgment where he held ‘Any Edict which is inconsistent with any section of the Constitution not suspended by Decree No. 1 of 1966 can be attacked and declared invalid’, because by implication such an Edict is inconsistent with Decree No. 1 of 1966, when the basis of the claim before him was the Constitution of the Federation.

2. That the court below had no jurisdiction to declare Part VIII particularly Sections 40(2), 41(1), 41(4) of the Education Edict, 1972 invalid.

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


THE INTENTION OF THE WESTERN LEGISLATURE WHEN IT ENACTED THE PUBLIC LANDS ACQUISITION LAW


“The intention of the Western Legislature (i.e. the “Regional Parliament”) when it enacted the Public Lands Acquisition Law was that compensation to be made to an owner of land compulsorily acquired from him must accord with well settled principles upon which compensation in such circumstances is to be assessed.” Per IDIGBE, JSC.

 


CASES CITED


Not Available

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Not Available

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.