ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE V MALLAM UMARU HASSAN - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE V MALLAM UMARU HASSAN

KATE ENTERPRISES LTD. V DAEWOO NIGERIA LTD.
July 22, 2025
LEGAL PRACTITIONERS DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE VS CHIEF GANI FAWEHINMI
July 22, 2025
KATE ENTERPRISES LTD. V DAEWOO NIGERIA LTD.
July 22, 2025
LEGAL PRACTITIONERS DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE VS CHIEF GANI FAWEHINMI
July 22, 2025
Show all

ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE V MALLAM UMARU HASSAN

Legalpedia Citation: (1985) Legalpedia (SC) 13111

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Jul 12, 1985

Suit Number: SC. 149/1984

CORAM


IKECHl FRANCIS OGBUAGU, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

IRIKEFE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

OKAY ACHIKE JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ANIAGOLU, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

UWAIS, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

KAZEEM, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

OPUTA, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

Following upon an outbreak of communal violence at JIKAMSHI VILLAGE, in the KANKIA LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA OF KADUNA STATE, one ABDUL RASHID UMARU lost his life, and arising therefrom, certain villagers were arrested and charged with the culpable homicide not punishable by death of the said Abdul Rashid Umaru. After arraignment at the High Court and the recording of pleas, the Solicitor-General of Kaduna State MR. J.H. MAIGIDA who was leading the prosecution on behalf of the State, entered a nolle prosequi in respect of the charges, stating that he did so, in reliance upon Section 130(1) C.P.C. and Section 191(2)(c) of the Constitution of Nigeria, 1979.


HELD


APPEAL DISMISSED:


ISSUES


None.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


BROADER OF INTERPRETATION OF THE CONSTITUTION


“Where the question is whether the Constitution has used an expression in the wider or in the narrower sense the court should always lean where the justice of the case so demands to the broader interpretation unless there is something in the content or in the rest of the Constitution to indicate that the narrower interpretation will best carry out its object and purpose”. UDOMA, J.S.C PER IRIKEFE, J.S.C


CASES CITED


RABIU v. THE STATE (1980) 8/11 SC. 130


STATUTES REFERRED TO


None.


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.