ALHAJI UMAR MUSA YAR’ADUA 7 ANOR V ALHAJI ATIKU ABUBAKAR & ORS - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

ALHAJI UMAR MUSA YAR’ADUA 7 ANOR V ALHAJI ATIKU ABUBAKAR & ORS

HONOURABLE GOZIE AGBAKOBA VS INEC & ORS
May 28, 2025
MRS. T. C. CHUKWUMA V MR. BABAWALE IFELOYE
May 28, 2025
HONOURABLE GOZIE AGBAKOBA VS INEC & ORS
May 28, 2025
MRS. T. C. CHUKWUMA V MR. BABAWALE IFELOYE
May 28, 2025
Show all

ALHAJI UMAR MUSA YAR’ADUA 7 ANOR V ALHAJI ATIKU ABUBAKAR & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (2008-12) Legalpedia (SC) 01291

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Dec 12, 2008

Suit Number: SC. 274/2007

CORAM


DAHIRU MUSDAPHER, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

MAHMUD MOHAMMED,, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

DAHIRU MUSDAPHER, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

MAHMUD MOHAMMED,, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

M.E. OGUNDARE – JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT (Read the Leading Judgment)

IDRIS LEGBO KUTIGI, (Lead Judgment), JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ALOYSIUS IYORGYER KATSINA-ALU, , JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

MAHMUD MOHAMMED,, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

DAHIRU MUSDAPHER, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

DAHIRU MUSDAPHER, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

MAHMUD MOHAMMED,, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

DAHIRU MUSDAPHER, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

DAHIRU MUSDAPHER, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

IDRIS LEGBO KUTIGI, (Lead Judgment), JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ALOYSIUS IYORGYER KATSINA-ALU, , JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

IDRIS LEGBO KUTIGI, (Lead Judgment), JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

DAHIRU MUSDAPHER, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


1. ALHAJI UMAR MUSA YAR’ADUA

2. DR. GOODLUCK JONATHAN.

APPELLANTS 


ALHAJI ATIKU ABUBAKAR & ORS

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

This is an interlocutory appeal against the Ruling of the Court of Appeal, in exercise of its original jurisdiction under section 239(1)(a) of the Constitution. While this appeal was still pending in the Supreme Court final judgment was entered against the Petitioners/Respondents at the court of appeal in the main suit.


HELD


Supreme Court held that the matter had been overtaken by events.


ISSUES


Whether a litigant can retiligate an identical issue which had been decided against him. ?


RATIONES DECIDENDI


ABUSE OF COURT PROCESSES


It is an abuse of process of Court for a plaintiff to re-litigate an identical issue which had been decided against him and So also where, proceedings which were viable when instituted have by reason of subsequent events become inescapably doomed to failure. PER. KUTIGI CJN.


CASES CITED


1. Union Bank of Nigeria v. Alhaja Bisi. Edionseri (1988) 2 NWLR (Pt. 74) 932. Olade v. Ekwelenju (1989) 4 NWLR (Pt. 115) 326.


STATUTES REFERRED TO


None


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.