ALHAJI SALISU BABUGA VS THE STATE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

ALHAJI SALISU BABUGA VS THE STATE

OMIMKE EBEVUHE & ORS VS MADAM ETIBIO UKPAKARA & ORS
July 4, 2025
JOSEPH ONWU & ORS VS EZEKIEL NKA
July 4, 2025
OMIMKE EBEVUHE & ORS VS MADAM ETIBIO UKPAKARA & ORS
July 4, 2025
JOSEPH ONWU & ORS VS EZEKIEL NKA
July 4, 2025
Show all

ALHAJI SALISU BABUGA VS THE STATE

Legalpedia Citation: (1996) Legalpedia (SC) 11541

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Tue Jul 9, 1996

Suit Number: SC.123/1995

CORAM


SALIHU MODIBBO ALFA BELGORE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

IBRAHIM TANKO MUHAMMAD, JUSTICE, SUPREME CORUT

UTHMAN MOHAMMED JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

SYLVESTER UMARU ONU JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ANTHONY IKECHUKWU IGUH JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


ALHAJI SALISU BABUGA APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The deceased Mamuda Gambo, was a neighbour of the appellant and P.W.1, Haruna Mohammed. They all met and drank after which the appellant, Alhaji Salisu Babuga  invited P.W. 1 and the deceased for a trip to Bagauda Lake Hotel on a picnic. On their way, the appellant stopped to ease himself, P.W. 1 and the deceased, also came out and walked a little in front of the car to urinate. As they squatted, the appellant entered the car and rolled over the deceased and P.W.1 ?


HELD


The judgment of the Court of Appeal upholding the conviction of the appellant for culpable homicide under S. 221 of the Penal Code and the sentence of death passed by the trial Court are hereby affirmed. ?


ISSUES


Whether the evidence was withheld in this particular case.Whether the two medical reports could be admitted in evidence without the doctor himself being called?


RATIONES DECIDENDI


BURDEN OF PROOF IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS


In all prosecution of criminal offences, the burden on the prosecution is to prove beyond reasonable doubt the guilt of the accused.


WHEN THE COURT WILL CONVICT AN ACCUSED


Where the circumstances of the attack on the deceased are clear, the injuries inflicted upon him as a result of the attack are graphically described to lead to no other conclusion than that the deceased died as a result of the attack and the injuries, the Court can convict even if there is no medical evidence and even if the body of to deceased is not recovered. Per BELGORE, JSC


CASES CITED


Onubogu v. The State (1974) 9 SC 1 at 20Ogundipe & Ors. v. The Queen (1954) XIV WACA 465.


STATUTES REFERRED TO


None.


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.