ALHAJI AHMED AYUB-KHAN VS THE STATE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

ALHAJI AHMED AYUB-KHAN VS THE STATE

OYIBO IRIRI & ORS VS ESERORAYE ERHURHOBARE & ANOR
July 14, 2025
UMUKORO USIKARO & ORS VS ITSEKIRI COMMUNAL LAND TRUSTEES & ORS
July 14, 2025
OYIBO IRIRI & ORS VS ESERORAYE ERHURHOBARE & ANOR
July 14, 2025
UMUKORO USIKARO & ORS VS ITSEKIRI COMMUNAL LAND TRUSTEES & ORS
July 14, 2025
Show all

ALHAJI AHMED AYUB-KHAN VS THE STATE

Legalpedia Citation: (1991-02) Legalpedia 69201 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden at Lagos

Fri Feb 22, 1991

Suit Number: SC 226/1990

CORAM


OBASEKI , JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

KARIBI-WHYTE, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

BELGORE, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

OLATAWURA, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

AKPATA, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


ALHAJI AHMED AYUB-KHAN

APPELLANTS 


THE STATE

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


CRIMINAL  LAW – STEALING

 

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The accused/appellant was charged with stealing and convicted of criminal breach of trust by a public servant under S.315 penal code and attempted criminal misappropriation. The appellant was convicted of theft on appeal to Supreme Court

 

 


HELD


The court held that the appeal is dismissed and that the trial magistrate had been lenient in convicting the appellant for a lesser offence of theft

 

 


ISSUES


Whether the proceeding is null and void because the trial magistrate called two witnesses after the defence has closed its case before judgment.

 

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


WHAT JUSTICE IS


Justice must demand the calling of the witness. In this case justice implies what is reasonably just in a final decision of the case – per S.M.A BELGORE   J.S.C

 

 


CASES CITED


(1)R Vs Frost (1839) 4ST, TR 85

(2) Commissioner of police Vs  Prediegha    (1975) NWLR 170

(3) Garba Dandare  Vs  The state  (1966)NWLR 129

(4) Juma Ali  Vs  Republic  (1964) EA 461

(5) Bawa Jubril Vs The State (1968) 1AII nlr 91

 

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


(1) Criminal procedure Code

(2) Criminal Procedure Act

 

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.