AFRICAN INSURANCE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION V NIGERIA LNG LIMITED - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

AFRICAN INSURANCE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION V NIGERIA LNG LIMITED

PRINCE NGENE VS CHIKE IGBO & ANOR.
June 26, 2025
OBA AMOS BABATUNDE & ANOR V SIMON OLATUNJI & ANOR
June 26, 2025
PRINCE NGENE VS CHIKE IGBO & ANOR.
June 26, 2025
OBA AMOS BABATUNDE & ANOR V SIMON OLATUNJI & ANOR
June 26, 2025
Show all

AFRICAN INSURANCE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION V NIGERIA LNG LIMITED

Legalpedia Citation: (2000) Legalpedia (SC) 57931

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Feb 11, 2000

Suit Number: SC.174/98

CORAM


SALIHU MODIBBO ALFA BELGORE JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

IDRIS LEGBO KUTIGI JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ALOYSIUS IYORGYER KATSINA–ALU JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

AKINTOLA OLUFEMI EJIWUNMI JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

EMMANUEL OLAYINKA AYOOLA JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT.


PARTIES


AFRICAN INSURANCE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The defendant entered into a performance bond with the plaintiff under which it stood as surety to a 3rd party’s (contractor) performance of a building contract. When the respondent instituted action to enforce the bond, the appellant applied that the matter be referred to arbitration provided for in the building contract between the plaintiff and the contractor.


HELD


The court dismissed the appeal and held that the performance bond was a guarantee and that the appellant was not a party to the building contract and such could not be granted stay of proceedings.


ISSUES


Whether the defendant, who is neither a party to the arbitration agreement nor a derivative party, is entitled to a stay of proceedings in an action brought on the guarantee.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


THE DOCTRINE OF PRIVITY OF CONTRACT


“Privity of contract is still very much a part of our law of contractual liability. A third party who was not privy to a contract cannot ordinarily be held responsible for the damages incurred by default of one of the parties.”- Belgore J.S.C


WHEN THE RIGHT OF ACTION ARISES AGAINST A GUARANTOR


” The right of action against a guarantor arises on a default by the principal debtor and not on a finding of liability against such debtor .”- Ayoola J.S.C.


CASES CITED


Trafalgar House Construction (Regions) Ltd v. General Surety and Guarantee Co Ltd (1995)3 All ER 737 Ikpeazu v. African Continental Bank Ltd (1965) N.M.L.R 374; Dunlop Pneumatic & Company Ltd v. Selfridge & Co. Ltd (1914 – 15) ALL E.R Rep. 333.


STATUTES REFERRED TO


The Arbitration And Conciliation Decree (1988)?


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.