ADENIRAN EMMANUEL VS EMMANUEL ALAO & ANOR - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

ADENIRAN EMMANUEL VS EMMANUEL ALAO & ANOR

CHIEF GORDON JOE YOUNG JACK V CHIEF R.I.T. WHYTE
June 25, 2025
ABDUN KAKA V. MALAMI NAGWANJA
June 25, 2025
CHIEF GORDON JOE YOUNG JACK V CHIEF R.I.T. WHYTE
June 25, 2025
ABDUN KAKA V. MALAMI NAGWANJA
June 25, 2025
Show all

ADENIRAN EMMANUEL VS EMMANUEL ALAO & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation:

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

HOLDEN AT ABUJA

Mon Feb 12, 2001

Suit Number: SC 90/1995

CORAM


BODE RHODES -VIVOUR     JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

OLAJIDE OLATAWURA., JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ABUBAKAR BASHIR WALL JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

U.A. KALGO


PARTIES


MR. EMMANUEL A. ADENIRAN APPELLANTS


MR. EMMANUEL ALAO TOSIL HOLDING LIMITED RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Appellant as plaintiff at the trial Court sued inter alia for a declaration of title to a statutory right of occupancy to a parcel of land at Plot No. 53 Opebi Road, Onigbagbo village, Ikeja, Lagos. Lost at the Lower Courts thus this Appeal.


HELD


The Supreme Court held that the lower court improperly evaluated evidence led by the Appellant resulting in perverse judgment. Thus, entered a declaration that the Appellant is entitled to a Statutory right of occupancy of the said piece of land.


ISSUES


The Court adopted issues as formulated by the Appellant in this appeal thus: Whether under the facts and circumstances of this case where parties are agreed that no issue was joined on due execution of Exhibit 1, the Learned Justices of the Court of Appeal were right to have affirmed the decision of the trial court that the appellant ought to prove the due execution of Exhibit 1 and or failed to prove same. Whether the appellant established his claim of being entitled to the grant of statutory right of occupancy to the land in dispute, trespass and injunction as against the respondents. Whether under the facts and circumstances of this case, the court of Appeal rightly held that the equitable defences of estoppel, laches and acquiescent availed the respondents.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


CASES CITED


1. AFRICAN CONTINENTAL SEAWAYS LTD V. NIGERIAN DREDGING ROADS & GENERAL WORKS LTD (1977) 5 SC 235 AT 250|2. Idundun V. Okumagba (1976) 9-10 SC. 227|3. ALIYU V. SODIPO (1994) 5 NWLR (PT. 342) 1|4. WUTA OFEI V. DANQUAH (1961) 3 AUER 596|5. ALATISHE V. SANYAOLU (1964) 1 ALL NLR (PT. 1) 398|6. MOGAGI V. CADBURY LTD. (1972) 2 SC 97|7. LADIPO V. AGANI (1997) 8 NWLR (PT. 517) 356


STATUTES REFERRED TO


None.|


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.